Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 13;9(1):7267.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43856-6.

High intimal flap mobility assessed by intravascular ultrasound is associated with better short-term results after TEVAR in chronic aortic dissection

Affiliations

High intimal flap mobility assessed by intravascular ultrasound is associated with better short-term results after TEVAR in chronic aortic dissection

Julia Lortz et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in chronic aortic dissection remains controversial. We analysed whether a high intimal flap mobility (IFM) of the dissection membrane has an impact on aortic remodelling after TEVAR in chronic Type B aortic dissection. Patients undergoing TEVAR with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were analysed and IFM was calculated. High IFM was defined as maximum flap amplitude >3 mm. For determining aortic remodelling, the degree of true lumen (TL) expansion was analysed in the last available follow-up CT. Fifty-two patients (63.6 ± 15.4 years) with a mean follow-up of 26.6 ± 20.7 months were analysed. The mobile flap group (n = 29) showed higher absolute TL expansion at the distal stent-graft (5.9 ± 3.1 vs. 3.3 ± 5.4 mm; p = 0.036) and a higher increase in TL diameter (18 ± 10 vs. 9 ± 15%; p = 0.017) compared to the non-mobile group (n = 23). Basic TEVAR-related outcome characteristics were comparable, but the mobile intimal flap group showed a lower re-intervention rate (3 vs. 8pts.; p = 0.032) in chronic dissections. High IFM in chronic Type B aortic dissection is linked to improved aortic remodelling and is associated with a lower re-intervention rate over time. IVUS assessment of IFM in chronic Type B aortic dissection might be helpful in identifying patients with better remodelling after TEVAR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of mobile (A) and non-mobile (B) intimal flaps in chronic Type B aortic dissection. Amplitude of intimal flap mobility (white dot) was assessed by connecting the endpoints of the dissected flap and drawing a perpendicular line through the mid point of this line. The minimum and maximum diameter between the intimal flap (*) and the free aortic wall (+) defined the maximum amplitude of intimal flap mobility.

References

    1. Rohlffs F, et al. Chronic type B aortic dissection: indications and strategies for treatment. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015;56:231–238. - PubMed
    1. Cooper M, Hicks C, Ratchford EV, Salameh MJ, Malas M. Diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection. Vasc Med. 2016;21:547–552. doi: 10.1177/1358863X16643601. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fleerakkers J, Schepens M. How should we manage type B aortic dissections? Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;8:1–9. - PubMed
    1. Khoynezhad A, Toluie S, Al-Atassi T. Treatment of the Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection: The Pro-endovascular Argument. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29:131–136. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.03.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Erbel R, et al. ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873–2926. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281. - DOI - PubMed