Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 1;69(5):389-397.
doi: 10.1093/biosci/biz039. Epub 2019 May 8.

Direct Ties to a Faculty Mentor Related to Positive Outcomes for Undergraduate Researchers

Megha Joshi  1 , Melissa L Aikens  2 , Erin L Dolan  3
Affiliations

Direct Ties to a Faculty Mentor Related to Positive Outcomes for Undergraduate Researchers

Megha Joshi et al. Bioscience. .

Abstract

Mentored research is critical for integrating undergraduates into the scientific community. Undergraduate researchers experience a variety of mentoring structures, including dyads (i.e., direct mentorship by faculty) and triads (i.e., mentorship by graduate or postdoctoral researchers [postgraduates] and faculty). Social capital theory suggests that these structures may offer different resources that differentially benefit undergraduates. To test this, we collected data from a national sample of more than 1,000 undergraduate life science researchers and used structural equation modeling to identify relationships between mentoring structures and indicators of integration into the scientific community. Undergraduates in dyads and triads with direct faculty interactions reported similar levels of science self-efficacy, scientific identity, and scholarly productivity, and higher levels of these outcomes than students in triads lacking faculty interactions. Undergraduates' career intentions were unrelated to their mentoring structure, and their gains in thinking and working like scientists were higher if they interacted with both postgraduates and faculty.

Keywords: Undergraduate research; mentoring; science self-efficacy; scientific identity; social capital.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Undergraduate research mentoring structures. In dyad mentoring structures (depicted on the left), the undergraduate researcher (U) is directly mentored by the faculty member (F). In triad mentoring structures, the undergraduate researcher is also mentored by a postgraduate (P). Lines between each member of the triad indicate a direct interaction (tie) between the triad members about the undergraduate's research (Aikens et al. 2016). The mentoring structures in black (dyad and triads 7 and 8) were the focus of this study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aikens ML, Robertson MM, Sadselia S, Watkins K, Evans M, Runyon CR, Eby LT, Dolan EL. 2017. Race and gender differences in undergraduate research mentoring structures and research outcomes. CBE—Life Sciences Education 16(art. 34). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aikens ML, Sadselia S, Watkins K, Evans M, Eby LT, Dolan EL. 2016. A social capital perspective on the mentoring of undergraduate life science researchers: An empirical study of undergraduate–postgraduate–faculty triads. CBE—Life Sciences Education 15(art. 16). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bandura A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman.
    1. Bourdieu P. 1997. The forms of capital. Pages 46–58 in Halsey AH, Lauder H, Brown P, Stuart Wells A, eds. Education: Culture, Economy, and Society. Oxford University Press.
    1. Burgin SR, Sadler TD.. 2013. Consistency of practical and formal epistemologies of science held by participants of a research apprenticeship. Research in Science Education 43: 2179–2206.