Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;42(10):1371-1379.
doi: 10.1007/s00270-019-02231-8. Epub 2019 May 13.

Image Fusion Guidance for In Situ Laser Fenestration of Aortic Stent graft for Endovascular Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysm: Feasibility, Efficacy and Overall Functional Success

Thomas Leger  1 , Vania Tacher  1   2   3 , Marek Majewski  4 , Joseph Touma  4 , Pascal Desgranges  2   4 , Hicham Kobeiter  5   6
Affiliations

Image Fusion Guidance for In Situ Laser Fenestration of Aortic Stent graft for Endovascular Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysm: Feasibility, Efficacy and Overall Functional Success

Thomas Leger et al. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate feasibility, efficacy and overall functional success of image fusion guidance during laser-assisted in situ fenestration of aortic stent graft (LISFAS) for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysm (complex-EVAR) in a prospective study.

Methods: Between September 2016 and July 2018, 20 patients were included and treated with LISFAS for complex-EVAR. Aortic aneurysms were either para-renal (n = 15) or thoraco-abdominal (n = 5) with 57 mm [first quartile: 54; third quartile: 68] median aneurysm diameter in 69 years [68;78] patients. All interventions were performed using the same angiographic system and 3D image fusion software for overlying pre-intervention CTA on per-intervention 2D fluoroscopy with cone-beam CT images to display target vessels ostia.

Results: LISFAS for complex-EVAR with image fusion was performed in all patients, and no endovascular intervention required conversion to an open aortic repair. LISFAS of all target vessels was feasible in 18 patients (90%); 48 fenestrations out of 50 were performed successfully. Two fenestrations failed for renal arteries in two patients. Median ischemic times were as follows: 34 min [25;43] for superior mesenteric artery; 69 min [56;83] for left renal artery; 73 min [36;102] for right renal artery; and 93 min [89;96] for the celiac trunk. Median intervention and fluoroscopy times, iodinated contrast volume and X-ray exposure were 180 min [150;180], 74 min [64;87], 80 mL [59;113] and 338 Gy.cm2 [259;495], respectively. Efficacy was found in 17 patients (85%) on one-week follow-up CTA: Two patients had type 1 and 3 endoleaks, respectively, that were successfully embolized. Overall functional success was 90%. Median hospitalization stay was 9 days [8, 17]. The 30-day safety analysis was 90% (n = 2 deaths) owing to an undetermined cause and to bowel ischemia after low flow in intensive care unit.

Conclusions: LISFAS using image fusion was feasible, efficient and overall functionally successful for complex-EVAR in this preliminary study.

Keywords: 3D image fusion guidance; Complex-AAA; Complex-EVAR; In situ laser fenestration.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources