An electronic health record-based interoperable eReferral system to enhance smoking Quitline treatment in primary care
- PMID: 31089727
- PMCID: PMC6696502
- DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz044
An electronic health record-based interoperable eReferral system to enhance smoking Quitline treatment in primary care
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to: An electronic health record-based interoperable eReferral system to enhance smoking Quitline treatment in primary care.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):1159. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz122. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31318421 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: The study sought to determine whether interoperable, electronic health record-based referral (eReferral) produces higher rates of referral and connection to a state tobacco quitline than does fax-based referral, thus addressing low rates of smoking treatment delivery in health care.
Materials and methods: Twenty-three primary care clinics from 2 healthcare systems (A and B) in Wisconsin were randomized, unblinded, over 2016-2017, to 2 smoking treatment referral methods: paper-based fax-to-quit (system A =6, system B = 6) or electronic (eReferral; system A = 5, system B = 6). Both methods referred adult patients who smoked to the Wisconsin Tobacco Quitline. A total of 14 636 smokers were seen in the 2 systems (system A: 54.5% women, mean age 48.2 years; system B: 53.8% women, mean age 50.2 years).
Results: Clinics with eReferral, vs fax-to-quit, referred a higher percentage of adult smokers to the quitline: system A clinic referral rate = 17.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.2%-18.5%) vs 3.8% (95% CI, 3.5%-4.2%) (P < .001); system B clinic referral rate = 18.9% (95% CI, 18.3%-19.6%) vs 5.2% (95% CI, 4.9%-5.6%) (P < .001). Average rates of quitline connection were higher in eReferral than F2Q clinics: system A = 5.4% (95% CI, 5.0%-5.8%) vs 1.3% (95% CI, 1.1%-1.5%) (P < .001); system B = 5.3% (95% CI, 5.0%-5.7%) vs 2.0% (95% CI, 1.8%-2.2%) (P < .001).
Discussion: Electronic health record-based eReferral provided an effective, closed-loop, interoperable means of referring patients who smoke to telephone quitline services, producing referral rates 3-4 times higher than the current standard of care (fax referral), including especially high rates of referral of underserved individuals.
Conclusions: eReferral may help address the challenge of providing smokers with treatment for tobacco use during busy primary care visits.ClinicalTrials.gov; No. NCT02735382.
Keywords: eReferral; electronic health record; interoperability; smoking cessation.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures


References
-
- Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Public Health Service; 2008.
-
- Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C, et al. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11: CD000146. - PubMed
-
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking - 50 years of progress: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014.
-
- U.S. National Cancer Institute, World Health Organization. The economics of tobacco and tobacco control. National Cancer Institute Tobacco Control Monograph 21, NIH Pub No> 16-CA-8029A; 2016. https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/tcrb/monographs/21/docs/m21_exec_su.... Accessed May 21, 2018.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Quitting smoking among adults - United States 2001-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011; 60 (44): 1513–9. - PubMed