Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May;19(3):201-204.
doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-201.

Switching immunoglobulin products, what are the implications? Result of 2018 census of immunology centres

Affiliations
Review

Switching immunoglobulin products, what are the implications? Result of 2018 census of immunology centres

Claire Bethune et al. Clin Med (Lond). 2019 May.

Abstract

The use of regular infusions of immunoglobulin is well established as a treatment for patients with antibody deficiency and for patients requiring immunomodulation. Although efficacy is believed to be equivalent for the different immunoglobulin products, it is generally regarded as best practice not to switch from one product to another unless there is a clinical reason to change. Changes in commissioning guidance and issues with the supply of some immunoglobulin products to the UK resulted in a requirement for a significant number of patients to switch between immunoglobulin products in 2017-2018. Data from the 2018 UK Primary Immunodeficiency census has been used to evaluate the clinical results of switching. Results from 30 immunology centres reported a total of 802 immunoglobulin product switches. Twelve reactions were recorded, none of which required admission to hospital, one patient was treated with oral corticosteroids, the others required either no treatment or treatment with oral antihistamines. This review of immunoglobulin product switch reactions gives a clearer indication regarding the safety of product switching than has previously been published.

Keywords: Immunoglobulin; immunodeficiency; immunomodulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Misbah SA. Should therapeutic immunoglobulin be considered a generic product? An evidence-based approach. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2013;567–72. - PubMed
    1. Ameratunga R, Sinclair J, Kolbe J. Increased risk of adverse events when changing immunoglobulin preparations. Clin Exp Immunol 2004;136:111–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aghamohammadi A, Farhoudi A, Nikzad M, et al. Adverse reactions of prophylactic intravenous immunoglobulin infusions in Iranian patients with primary immunodeficiency. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2004;92:60–4. - PubMed
    1. Chapel HM. Safety and availability of immunoglobulin replacement therapy in relation to potentially transmissable agents. Clin Exp Immunol 1999;118:22–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Royal College of Physicians. Quality in Primary Immunodeficiency Services. www.qpids.org.uk.

MeSH terms

Substances