Switching immunoglobulin products, what are the implications? Result of 2018 census of immunology centres
- PMID: 31092511
- PMCID: PMC6542228
- DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-201
Switching immunoglobulin products, what are the implications? Result of 2018 census of immunology centres
Abstract
The use of regular infusions of immunoglobulin is well established as a treatment for patients with antibody deficiency and for patients requiring immunomodulation. Although efficacy is believed to be equivalent for the different immunoglobulin products, it is generally regarded as best practice not to switch from one product to another unless there is a clinical reason to change. Changes in commissioning guidance and issues with the supply of some immunoglobulin products to the UK resulted in a requirement for a significant number of patients to switch between immunoglobulin products in 2017-2018. Data from the 2018 UK Primary Immunodeficiency census has been used to evaluate the clinical results of switching. Results from 30 immunology centres reported a total of 802 immunoglobulin product switches. Twelve reactions were recorded, none of which required admission to hospital, one patient was treated with oral corticosteroids, the others required either no treatment or treatment with oral antihistamines. This review of immunoglobulin product switch reactions gives a clearer indication regarding the safety of product switching than has previously been published.
Keywords: Immunoglobulin; immunodeficiency; immunomodulation.
© Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The Nuts and Bolts of Immunoglobulin Treatment for Antibody Deficiency.J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Nov-Dec;4(6):1076-1081.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.09.011. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016. PMID: 27836057 Review.
-
Efficacy and tolerability of 16% subcutaneous immunoglobulin compared with 20% subcutaneous immunoglobulin in primary antibody deficiency.Clin Exp Immunol. 2015 Sep;181(3):441-50. doi: 10.1111/cei.12623. Epub 2015 Jul 7. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015. PMID: 25761372 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy for Primary Immunodeficiency.Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2015 Nov;35(4):713-30. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Sep 4. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 26454315 Review.
-
Immunoglobulin replacement therapy for primary immunodeficiencies.Immunotherapy. 2014;6(7):853-69. doi: 10.2217/imt.14.54. Immunotherapy. 2014. PMID: 25290417 Review.
-
Immunoglobulin treatment in primary antibody deficiency.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011 May;37(5):396-404. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.11.027. Epub 2011 Jan 26. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011. PMID: 21276714 Review.
Cited by
-
More a hammer than a mirror.Clin Med (Lond). 2019 May;19(3):193. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-193. Clin Med (Lond). 2019. PMID: 31092509 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Understanding supply sustainability of plasma-derived medicinal products: Drivers and consequences of shortages.Vox Sang. 2025 Aug;120(8):754-764. doi: 10.1111/vox.70052. Epub 2025 May 26. Vox Sang. 2025. PMID: 40419326 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Misbah SA. Should therapeutic immunoglobulin be considered a generic product? An evidence-based approach. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2013;567–72. - PubMed
-
- Aghamohammadi A, Farhoudi A, Nikzad M, et al. Adverse reactions of prophylactic intravenous immunoglobulin infusions in Iranian patients with primary immunodeficiency. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2004;92:60–4. - PubMed
-
- Royal College of Physicians. Quality in Primary Immunodeficiency Services. www.qpids.org.uk.