Against the nihilism of 'legal age change': response to Räsänen
- PMID: 31092633
- DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105475
Against the nihilism of 'legal age change': response to Räsänen
Abstract
Räsänen has attempted to make a moral case for permitting some people to change their legal age: if someone considers that their chronological age does not correspond to their emotional age or biological age, and they face age-based discrimination as a result, they may change the legal record of their age. This response considers some of the problems with Räsänen's paper, including its reliance on equivocation. It concludes that what is billed as a moral argument turns out to be a conflicted case for deception which relies on a nihilistic outlook on reality.
Keywords: ethics; social aspects.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
-
Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics.J Med Ethics. 2019 Jul;45(7):471-472. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105547. Epub 2019 Jun 29. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 31256006
Comment on
-
Moral case for legal age change.J Med Ethics. 2019 Jul;45(7):461-464. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105294. Epub 2019 Mar 14. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30872325
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources