Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 6 2):S197-S201.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001051.

Clinician Experiences and Attitudes Regarding Screening for Social Determinants of Health in a Large Integrated Health System

Affiliations

Clinician Experiences and Attitudes Regarding Screening for Social Determinants of Health in a Large Integrated Health System

Adam Schickedanz et al. Med Care. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Clinical screening for basic social needs-such as food and housing insecurity-is becoming more common as health systems develop programs to address social determinants of health. Clinician attitudes toward such programs are largely unexplored.

Objective: To describe the attitudes and experiences of social needs screening among a variety of clinicians and other health care professionals.

Research design: Multicenter electronic and paper-based survey.

Subjects: Two hundred fifty-eight clinicians including primarily physicians, social workers, nurses, and pharmacists from a large integrated health system in Southern California.

Measures: Level of agreement with prompts exploring attitudes toward and barriers to screening and addressing social needs in different clinical settings.

Results: Overall, most health professionals supported social needs screening in clinical settings (84%). Only a minority (41%) of clinicians expressed confidence in their ability to address social needs, and less than a quarter (23%) routinely screen for social needs currently. Clinicians perceived lack of time to ask (60%) and resources (50%) to address social needs as their most significant barriers. We found differences by health profession in attitudes toward and barriers to screening for social needs, with physicians more likely to cite time constraints as a barrier.

Conclusions: Clinicians largely support social needs programs, but they also recognize key barriers to their implementation. Health systems interested in implementing social needs programs should consider the clinician perspective around the time and resources required for such programs and address these perceived barriers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Attitudes among clinician participants regarding screening for and addressing social needs
Shaded bars display the proportion of the sample indicating degree of agreement with each questionnaire prompt on a scale from Strongly Disagree (1) to Strongly Agree (5).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Barriers experienced by clinician participants to screening for social needs in practice
Legend: Shaded bars display the proportion of the sample indicating responses to each questionnaire prompt on a scale from Not at all a barrier (1) to A major barrier (5).

Comment in

References

    1. LaForge K, Gold R, Cottrell E, Bunce AE, Proser M, Hollombe C, Dambrun K, Cohen DJ, Clark KD. How 6 Organizations Developed Tools and Processes for Social Determinants of Health Screening in Primary Care: An Overview. The Journal of ambulatory care management. 2018. January;41(1):2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith L, Sion P, Stevenson A, Kasen P, Harstad N. Primed: Addressing Social Factors in the Health Care Safety Net. California Healthcare Foundation; November 2017.
    1. Billioux A, Conway PH, Alley DE. Addressing population health: Integrators in the Accountable Health Communities model. JAMA. 2017;318(19):1865–1866. PMID: . - PubMed
    1. Byhoff E, Freund KM, Garg A. Accelerating the implementation of social determinants of health interventions in internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2017; Epub ahead of print. PMID: . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gottlieb L, Ackerman S, Wing H, Adler N. Evaluation activities and influences at the intersection of medical and social services. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2017;28(3):931–951. - PubMed