Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0216874.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216874. eCollection 2019.

Music training with Démos program positively influences cognitive functions in children from low socio-economic backgrounds

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Music training with Démos program positively influences cognitive functions in children from low socio-economic backgrounds

Mylène Barbaroux et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the impact of a classic music training program (Démos) on several aspects of the cognitive development of children from low socio-economic backgrounds. We were specifically interested in general intelligence, phonological awareness and reading abilities, and in other cognitive abilities that may be improved by music training such as auditory and visual attention, working and short-term memory and visuomotor precision. We used a longitudinal approach with children presented with standardized tests before the start and after 18 months of music training. To test for pre-to-post training improvements while discarding maturation and developmental effects, raw scores for each child and for each test were normalized relative to their age group. Results showed that Démos music training improved musicality scores, total IQ and Symbol Search scores as well as concentration abilities and reading precision. In line with previous results, these findings demonstrate the positive impact of an ecologically-valid music training program on the cognitive development of children from low socio-economic backgrounds and strongly encourage the broader implementation of such programs in disadvantaged school-settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Experimental procedure with the different tests presented before and after 18 months of music training.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Pre- and post-training results for all tests.
A. Results for total Intelligence Quotient (IQ) score, for the four subtests of the reduced version of WISC-IV and for the digit span test are compared in the pre- and post-music training sessions. B. Results at the d2-R and NEPSY-II subtests are compared in the pre- and post-music training sessions. For both A and B, standard scores are indicated on the left ordinate and z-scores on the right ordinate. C. Results at the Alouette reading test and at the phonological tests are compared in the pre- and post-music training sessions. Z-scores are indicated on the left ordinate. Significant pre vs post differences with *: p < .05; ***: p < .001; ns: not significant. Error bars are standard errors of mean (SEM).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Violin plots for each test showing significant improvements from pre to post-music training.
Violin plots (R Development Core Team, 2018) show the shape of the distribution. Each black dot represents one child, the red dot corresponds to the mean and the red line to the standard deviation (SD). Z-scores are indicated on the ordinate.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Results of cluster analyses for the five tests showing significant post minus pre- music training differences.
For each test, each box plot corresponds to one cluster and the dots represent the children within each cluster. For each box plot, the upper quartile, the median and the lower quartile are represented together with the upper and lower whiskers. Significant increases or decreases in post minus pre-differences compared to 0 (no change) are indicated with *: p < .05; **: p < .01 and ***: p < .001.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Results of simple regression analysis showing a significant correlation (p < .001) between initial IQ score and improvement in IQ.

References

    1. Schellenberg EG. Long-term positive associations between music lessons and IQ. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2006;98(2):457–68.
    1. Schellenberg EG, Mankarious M. Music training and emotion comprehension in childhood. Emotion. 2012;12(5):887–91. 10.1037/a0027971 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schellenberg EG. Examining the association between music lessons and intelligence. British journal of psychology. 2011;102(3):283–302. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02000.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schellenberg EG. Music Lessons Enhance IQ. Psychological Science. 2004;15(8):511–4. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00711.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sala G, Gobet F. When the music’s over. Does music skill transfer to children’s and young adolescents’ cognitive and academic skills? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review. 2017;20:55–67.

Publication types