Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1987 May 9;294(6581):1192-5.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6581.1192.

Randomised comparison of early versus late induction of labour in post-term pregnancy

Clinical Trial

Randomised comparison of early versus late induction of labour in post-term pregnancy

K Augensen et al. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). .

Abstract

In a prospective randomised study of mothers referred for prolonged pregnancy (around the 42nd week) 214 (group 1) were submitted to attempted induction of labour and 195 (group 2) assigned to continue for a further week without intervention. Strict selection criteria were used for the certainty of term. Mothers in group 2 were given regular non-stress tests to ensure fetal wellbeing, as were those in group 1 in whom induction failed. In group 1, 48 (23%) out of 210 first attempted inductions failed. In group 2, 135 (69%) of the births started spontaneously as compared with 38 (18%) in group 1. The mean duration of labour was 7.5 hours in each group. There was no significant difference in incidence of operative delivery, use of analgesics, or signs of perinatal asphyxia. Significantly more children in group 1 needed phototherapy for hyperbilirubinaemia. There was a clustering of births in the late afternoon and evening, which was most pronounced in group 1. A policy of vigilant non-intervention up to the 44th completed week of pregnancy does not appear to jeopardize mother or fetus.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1969 Feb;76(2):131-6 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1975 Apr 19;2(5963):116-8 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1975 Apr 5;1(7910):767-70 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1978 Feb;85(2):109-13 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1978 May 13;1(6122):1235-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources