Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Aug;72(4):297-322.
doi: 10.4097/kja.19169. Epub 2019 May 17.

The role of evidence-based algorithms for rotational thromboelastometry-guided bleeding management

Affiliations
Review

The role of evidence-based algorithms for rotational thromboelastometry-guided bleeding management

Klaus Görlinger et al. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a point-of-care viscoelastic method and enables to assess viscoelastic profiles of whole blood in various clinical settings. ROTEM-guided bleeding management has become an essential part of patient blood management (PBM) which is an important concept in improving patient safety. Here, ROTEM testing and hemostatic interventions should be linked by evidence-based, setting-specific algorithms adapted to the specific patient population of the hospitals and the local availability of hemostatic interventions. Accordingly, ROTEM-guided algorithms implement the concept of personalized or precision medicine in perioperative bleeding management ('theranostic' approach). ROTEM-guided PBM has been shown to be effective in reducing bleeding, transfusion requirements, complication rates, and health care costs. Accordingly, several randomized-controlled trials, meta-analyses, and health technology assessments provided evidence that using ROTEM-guided algorithms in bleeding patients resulted in improved patient's safety and outcomes including perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, the implementation of ROTEM in the PBM concept requires adequate technical and interpretation training, education and logistics, as well as interdisciplinary communication and collaboration.

Keywords: Algorithms; Bleeding management; Health care costs; Impedance aggregometry; Patient blood management; Thromboelastometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

Klaus Görlinger is working as the Medical Director of Tem Innovations since July 2012. Daniel Dirkmann, Fuat Saner and Marc Maegele are members of the scientific advisory committee of Instrumentation Laboratory and received travel expense refunds and speakers fees from Tem Innovations, Instrumentation Laboratory/Werfen, and CSL Behring. Antonio Pérez-Ferrer, Angelo Augusto Pérez Calatayud and Tae-Yop Kim reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
ROTEM trace (‘temogram’) displaying the clinically most important parameters and their informative value. FDPs: fibrin (ogen) split products. Courtesy of Klaus Görlinger, Germany.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Characteristic ROTEM traces. The diagnostic performance is increased by test combinations, e.g., EXTEM and FIBTEM, EXTEM and APTEM, or INTEM and HEPTEM. CT: coagulation time, A5: amplitude of clot firmness 5 min after CT, A10: amplitude of clot firmness 10 min after CT, MCF: maximum clot firmness, ML: maximum lysis during runtime, LI60: lysis index 60 min after CT, TXA: tranexamic acid (or other antifibrinolytic drug), FXIII: coagulation factor XIII, GPIIbIIIa-R: GPIIbIIIa-receptor, CFT: clot formation time, CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass, HLE: heparin-like effect, OLT: orthotopic liver transplantation, 4F-PCC: four factor prothrombin complex concentrate, EX: EXTEM, FIB: FIBTEM, HEP: HEPTEM, IN: INTEM. Courtesy of Klaus Görlinger, Germany.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Evidence-based algorithms for ROTEM (A5)-guided bleeding management in (A) cardiovascular surgery and (B) liver transplantation. Algorithm footnotes: 1Timing of ROTEM-analysis during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT): Baseline; re-check after 60 min or in case of bleeding during pre-anhepatic phase; 5–10 min after cava clamping (early anhepatic phase); 30–45 mm after cava clamping (late anhepatic phase); 5–10 min after reperfusion; 30–45 min after reperfusion; skin closure; and always in case of diffuse bleeding as well as 10–15 min after a specific hemostatic intervention. 2Check basic conditions: Temp. > 35℃; pH > 7.3; Cai2+ > 1 mmol/L; Hb ≥ 7 g/dl. 3Antifibrinolytic therapy [105,107]: EACA can be used instead of TXA (based on local practice). CTFIB > 600 s represents a flat-line in FIBTEM. Only pre-anhepatic hyperfibrinolysis is associated with increased mortality in OLT [103]; hyperfibrinolysis at/after reperfusion without diffuse bleeding may be self-limiting; re-check ROTEM analysis after ML reached 15% and consider avoidance of TXA treatment. 4Fibrinogen dose calculation (stepwise approach; see Table 2): Fibrinogen dose (g) = targeted increase in A5FIB (mm) × body weight (kg) / 160. Correction factor (140–160 mm kg/g) depends on the actual plasma volume. 10 U Cryoprecipitate ≈ 2 g Fibrinogen concentrate. 5Platelet concentrate transfusion: Cave: Platelet transfusion is associated with increased mortality in liver transplantation [123]! Consider compensation by increased A5FIB ≥ 12 mm. Cardiovascular surgery: Check platelet function with ROTEM platelet (ADPTEM and TRAPTEM) or Multiplate after weaning from CPB and heparin reversal with protamine: A5EX 23–30 mm or ADPTEM ≤ 35 Ohm∙min: 1 pooled or apheresis platelet concentrate. A5EX 15–22 mm or (ADPTEM ≤ 35 Ohm∙min and TRAPTEM ≤ 45 Ohm∙min): 2 platelet concentrates. A5EX < 15 mm: 2 platelet concentrates + fibrinogen substitution. 6If 4-factor prothrombin-complex-concentrate (4F-PCC) is not available: 10–15 ml FFP /kg bw or 45 (−90) µg rFVIIa /kg bw (if patient is normothermic and pH > 7.3, Cai2+ > 1 mmol/L, A5EX ≥ 30 mm, and A5FIB ≥ 9 mm but FFP is not effective to decrease CTEX ≤ 80 s and CTHEP ≤ 280 s). 7Anti-thrombin (AT) substitution: Consider AT substitution in patients with an increased risk of thrombosis (e.g., primary biliary cirrhosis, Budd-Chiari-Syndrome, portal vein thrombosis, malignancies) and/ or known pre-existing severe AT deficiency. 8Protamine: Endogenous heparin effect after liver graft reperfusion usually is self-limiting and does not require reversal by protamine. However, consider protamine administration in severe bleeding. 9Simultaneous interventions: Maximal three interventions at the same time (in first analysis and severe bleeding). Maximal two interventions at the same time (in second analysis and moderate to severe bleeding). Only one intervention at the same time (in second or later analysis and mild to moderate bleeding). A5EX: amplitude of clot firmness 5 min after coagulation time in EXTEM, CTFIB: coagulation time in FIBTEM (CTFIB > 600 s reflects a flat-line in FIBTEM), ML: maximum lysis (within 1 h run time), ACT: activated clotting time, CTIN: coagulation time in INTEM, CTHEP: coagulation time in HEPTEM, bw: body weight, A5FIB: amplitude of clot firmness 5 min after CT in FIBTEM, CTEX: coagulation time in EXTEM, PCC: prothrombin complex concentrate, FFP: fresh frozen plasma, LI60: Lysis Index (residual clot firmness in % of MCF) 60 min after CT, LI30: Lysis Index (residual clot firmness in % of MCF) 30 min after CT, IU: international units, AT: anti-thrombin, Cai2+: ionized Calcium concentration, EACA: epsilon-aminocaproic acid, TXA: tranexamic acid, CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass, rFVIIa: activated recombinant factor VII. Courtesy of Klaus Görlinger, Germany.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Evidence-based algorithms for ROTEM (A5)-guided bleeding management in (A) trauma/orthopedic surgery and (B) obstetrics/postpartum hemorrhage. Algorithm footnotes: 1Check basic conditions: Temp. > 35℃; pH > 7.3; Cai2+ > 1 mmol/L; Hb ≥ 7 g/dl. 2Antifibrinolytic therapy [105,142-146,153,157,195]: Prophylactic administration of TXA can be given within 3 h after trauma or delivery [142-144,195]. Continuous infusion of TXA can be performed in trauma [142-144]. CTFIB > 600 s represents a flat-line in FIBTEM. EACA can be used instead of TXA (based on local practice). 3Fibrinogen dose calculation (stepwise approach; see Table 2): Fibrinogen dose (g) = targeted increase in A5FIB (mm) × body weight (kg)/ 160. Correction factor (140–160 mm kg/g) depends on the actual plasma volume. 10 U Cryoprecipitate ≈ 2 g Fibrinogen concentrate. 4Platelet concentrate transfusion: Check platelet function with ROTEM platelet (ADPTEM and TRAPTEM) or Multiplate, if available [168-169]. Cave: Platelet transfusion might not improve platelet function in TIC [170]. Consider compensation by increased A5FIB ≥ 12 mm. Consider TXA (25 mg/kg) and/or desmopressin (DDAVP; 0.3 µg/kg) in patients with dual antiplatelet therapy and/or ADPTEM < 30 Ω∙min. Expected increase per pooled/apheresis PC per 80 kg: 8–10 mm in A5EX. A5EX 28–35 mm or ADPTEM < 40 Ω∙min: 1 pooled or apheresis platelet concentrate. A5EX 20–28 mm or (ADPTEM < 40 Ω∙min and TRAPTEM < 50 Ω∙min): 2 pooled or apheresis platelet concentrates. A5EX < 20 mm: 2 platelet concentrates + fibrinogen substitution (≥ 4 g). 5If 4-factor prothrombin-complex-concentrate (4F-PCC) is not available: 10–15 ml FFP /kg bw or 45–90 µg rFVIIa /kg bw (if patient is normothermic and pH > 7.3, and Cai2+ > 1 mmol/L, and A5EX ≥ 35 mm, and A5FIB ≥ 9 mm but FFP is not effective to decrease CTEX ≤ 80 s and CTHEP ≤ 240 s). Consider acquired hemophilia A in early severe bleeding, EXTEM and FIBTEM are normal but CTIN and CTHEP are significantly prolonged (see Fig. 6). Therapy: rFVIIa. 6Protamine: Endogenous HLE might occur in severe trauma and shock. Hemodynamic stabilization is the most important therapy. However, protamine administration might be considered in severe bleeding. 7Simultaneous interventions: Maximal three interventions at the same time (in first analysis and severe bleeding). Maximal two interventions at the same time (in second analysis and moderate to severe bleeding). Only one intervention at the same time (in second or later analysis and mild to moderate bleeding). ISS: injury severity score, TASH: trauma associated sever hemorrhage, A5EX: amplitude of clot firmness 5 min after coagulation time (CT) in EXTEM, CTFIB: CT in FIBTEM (CTFIB > 600 s reflects a flatline in FIBTEM), ML: maximum lysis (within 1 h run time), A5FIB: amplitude of clot firmness 5 min after CT in FIBTEM, bw: body weight, CTEX: CT in EXTEM, 4F-PCC: four factor prothrombin complex concentrate, IU: international units, FFP: fresh frozen plasma, CTIN: CT in INTEM, CTHEP: CT in HEPTEM, PPH: postpartum hemorrhage, TXA: tranexamic acid, rFVIIa: activated recombinant factor VII, Cai2+: ionized Calcium concentration, EACA: epsilon-aminocaproic acid, TIC: trauma-induced coagulopathy, HLE: heparin-like effect. Courtesy of Klaus Görlinger, Germany.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
A case of ROTEM-guided bleeding management in postpartum hemorrhage. The first ROTEM was performed after PPH activation of the anesthesia team. The first ROTEM showed already a decreased FIBTAM A5 (4 mm) and a late hyperfibrinolysis in FIBTEM (ML 23%). Unfortunately, this has not been treated at this time and coagulopathy and bleeding progressed within the next hour. Due to the delay in treatment, the second ROTEM showed a fulminant hyperfibrinolysis and a flat-line in FIBTEM. Accordingly, 2 g tranexamic acid and 4 g fibrinogen concentrate have been administered (calculated increase in A5FIB, 8 mm) within 20 min after the second ROTEM analysis and the effect has been checked with the third ROTEM analysis 8 min later. Here, the measured increase in A5FIB was 2 mm below the calculated increase due to the ongoing bleeding. The prolonged EXTEM CT in the second ROTEM (due to the lack of fibrinogen) normalized in the third ROTEM (borderline results with CTEX 78 s and CTFIB 85 s). EXTEM and FIBTEM clot firmness (A5) improved but were still too low and associated with ongoing bleeding. Therefore, further 4 g fibrinogen concentrate, 2 pooled platelet concentrates, and 1500 IU 4F-PCC have been administered in the second ROTEM-guided intervention. This intervention stopped the bleeding and the fourth ROTEM analysis showed a normal temogram for a pregnant woman. The time between the second and fourth ROTEM analysis—including the two ROTEM-guided interventions—was 69 min and overall 6 U RBC and no FFP have been transfused to the patient. No TRALI, TACO, or other complications occurred, and the patient could be extubated after surgery and discharged from the ICU the next morning. PPH: postpartum hemorrhage, A5: amplitude of clot firmness 5 min after CT, A10: amplitude of clot firmness 10 min after CT, ML: maximum lysis during runtime, CT: coagulation time, CFT: clot formation time, MCF: maximum clot firmness, 4F-PCC: four factor prothrombin complex concentrate, RBC: red blood cells, FFP: fresh frozen plasma, TRALI: transfusion-related acute lung injury, TACO: transfusion-associated circulatory overload. Courtesy of Klaus Görlinger, Germany
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
ROTEM pattern of acquired hemophilia A with inhibitors to FVIII. Characteristic for acquired hemophilia, this ROTEM shows a significantly prolonged INTEM and HEPTEM CT (460 s and 555 s, respectively) but short CTs in EXTEM and FIBTEM (53 s and 45 s, respectively) since the extrinsic and common pathway are not affected by this coagulopathy. The appropriate treatment is rFVIIa (recombinant activated factor VII) or activated PCC (FEIBA, Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity). ST: start time, RT: run time, CT: coagulation time, CFT: clot formation time, α: alpha angle in °, A5: amplitude of clot firmness 5 min after CT, A10: amplitude of clot firmness 10 min after CT, MCF: maximum clot firmness, ML: maximum lysis during runtime. Courtesy of Klaus Görlinger, Germany.

References

    1. Zacharowski K, Spahn DR. Patient blood management equals patient safety. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2016;30:159–69. - PubMed
    1. Bochicchio GV, Napolitano L, Joshi M, Bochicchio K, Meyer W, Scalea TM. Outcome analysis of blood product transfusion in trauma patients: a prospective, risk-adjusted study. World J Surg. 2008;32:2185–9. - PubMed
    1. Ranucci M, Baryshnikova E, Castelvecchio S, Pelissero G. Major bleeding, transfusions, and anemia: the deadly triad of cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:478–85. - PubMed
    1. Turan A, Yang D, Bonilla A, Shiba A, Sessler DI, Saager L, et al. Morbidity and mortality after massive transfusion in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:761–70. - PubMed
    1. Ruseckaite R, McQuilten ZK, Oldroyd JC, Richter TH, Cameron PA, Isbister JP, et al. Descriptive characteristics and in-hospital mortality of critically bleeding patients requiring massive transfusion: results from the Australian and New Zealand Massive Transfusion Registry. Vox Sang. 2017;112:240–8. - PubMed