Determinants of price negotiations for new drugs. The experience of the Italian Medicines Agency

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this paper is to investigate the determinants of the difference between the price proposal submitted by the industry and the final negotiated price. We used Italy as a case-study.

Methods: Data were gathered through the information system used by Italian Medicines Agency. The time-frame for this analysis is 2013-2017. Factors influencing the delta price were analyzed through a regression analysis.

Results: 44 orphan drugs and 89 new other molecular entities obtained reimbursement in the last five years. Following the negotiation process, prices were lowered by 25.1% and 28.6% on average for orphan drugs and other molecules respectively. The price reduction was higher for innovative drugs (-32.2%). Statistically significant determinants associated to higher price reduction were: i) the implementation of a product specific monitoring registry, ii) the negotiation of a financial-based Managed Entry Agreement, iii) a target population larger than 20,000 patients, iv) an expected National Health Service expenditure larger than €200 million.

Discussion: The impact of some variables on the delta price was predictable (e.g. for drugs with an expected higher budget impact and a larger population target), others were more surprising (e.g. a significant price reduction for "innovative" drugs). The implementation of financial-based agreements, which often rely on confidential arrangements, was one of the determinants with higher impact on price reduction.

Keywords: AIFA; Delta price; Drug price negotiation; Health technology assessment; Italy; Managed entry agreements; Market access; Value-based pricing.