Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 May;34(Suppl 1):75-81.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04965-0.

Effects of Intensive Primary Care on High-Need Patient Experiences: Survey Findings from a Veterans Affairs Randomized Quality Improvement Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Intensive Primary Care on High-Need Patient Experiences: Survey Findings from a Veterans Affairs Randomized Quality Improvement Trial

Donna M Zulman et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May.

Abstract

Background: Intensive primary care programs aim to coordinate care for patients with medical, behavioral, and social complexity, but little is known about their impact on patient experience when implemented in a medical home.

Objective: Determine how augmenting the VA's medical home (Patient Aligned Care Team, PACT) with a PACT-Intensive Management (PIM) program influences patient experiences with care coordination, access, provider relationships, and satisfaction.

Design: Cross-sectional analysis of patient survey data from a five-site randomized quality improvement study.

Participants: Two thousand five hundred sixty-six Veterans with hospitalization risk scores ≥ 90th percentile and recent acute care.

Intervention: PIM offered patients intensive care coordination, including home visits, accompaniment to specialists, acute care follow-up, and case management from a team staffed by primary care providers, social workers, psychologists, nurses, and/or other support staff.

Main measures: Patient-reported experiences with care coordination (e.g., health goal assessment, test and appointment follow-up, Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC)), access to healthcare services, provider relationships, and satisfaction.

Key results: Seven hundred fifty-nine PIM and 768 PACT patients responded to the survey (response rate 60%). Patients randomized to PIM were more likely than those in PACT to report that they were asked about their health goals (AOR = 1.26; P = 0.046) and that they have a VA provider whom they trust (AOR = 1.35; P = 0.005). PIM patients also had higher mean (SD) PACIC scores compared with PACT patients (2.91 (1.31) vs. 2.75 (1.25), respectively; P = 0.022) and were more likely to report 10 out of 10 on satisfaction with primary care (AOR = 1.25; P = 0.048). However, other effects on coordination, access, and satisfaction did not achieve statistical significance.

Conclusions: Augmenting VA's patient-centered medical home with intensive primary care had a modestly positive influence on high-risk patients' experiences with care coordination and provider relationships, but did not have a significant impact on most patient-reported access and satisfaction measures.

Keywords: care coordination; patient-centered care; primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experiences of patients randomly allocated to PIM (N = 759) vs. PACT (N = 768). Superscript letter “a” indicates percentage of patients who responded “yes” when asked about receipt of services in the past 6 months. Superscript letter “b” indicates percentage of patients who responded that they “always” experience this element in their care. Superscript letter “c” indicates percentage of patients who responded that they “agree strongly” that they received or experienced the specified care.

References

    1. McWilliams JM. Cost Containment and the Tale of Care Coordination. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2218–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1610821. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal D, Chernof B, Fulmer T, Pumpkin J, Selberg J. Caring for High-Need, High-Cost Patients -- An Urgent Priority. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:909–11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1608511. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hong CS, Siegel AL, Ferris TG. Caring for high-need, high-cost patients: what makes for a successful care management program?: The Commonwealth Fund; 2014. - PubMed
    1. McCarthy D, Ryan J, Klein S. Models of care for high-need, high-cost patients: An evidence synthesis: The Commonwealth Fund; 2015. - PubMed
    1. Bodenheimer T. Strategies to Reduce Costs and Improve Care for High-Utilizing Medicaid Patients: Reflections on Pioneering Programs: Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc.; 2013.

Publication types