Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;82(4):1331-1342.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.27811. Epub 2019 May 17.

Free-running 3D whole heart myocardial T1 mapping with isotropic spatial resolution

Affiliations

Free-running 3D whole heart myocardial T1 mapping with isotropic spatial resolution

Haikun Qi et al. Magn Reson Med. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a free-running (free-breathing, retrospective cardiac gating) 3D myocardial T1 mapping with isotropic spatial resolution.

Methods: The free-running sequence is inversion recovery (IR)-prepared followed by continuous 3D golden angle radial data acquisition. 1D respiratory motion signal is extracted from the k-space center of all spokes and used to bin the k-space data into different respiratory states, enabling estimation and correction of 3D translational respiratory motion, whereas cardiac motion is recorded using electrocardiography and synchronized with data acquisition. 3D translational respiratory motion compensated T1 maps at diastole and systole were generated with 1.5 mm isotropic spatial resolution with low-rank inversion and high-dimensionality patch-based undersampled reconstruction. The technique was validated against conventional methods in phantom and 9 healthy subjects.

Results: Phantom results demonstrated good agreement (R2 = 0.99) of T1 estimation with reference method. Homogeneous systolic and diastolic 3D T1 maps were reconstructed from the proposed technique. Diastolic septal T1 estimated with the proposed method (1140 ± 36 ms) was comparable to the saturation recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) sequence (1153 ± 49 ms), but was higher than the modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence (1037 ± 33 ms). Precision of the proposed method (42 ± 8 ms) was comparable to MOLLI (41 ± 7 ms) and improved with respect to SASHA (87 ± 19 ms).

Conclusions: The proposed free-running whole heart T1 mapping method allows for reconstruction of isotropic resolution 3D T1 maps at different cardiac phases, serving as a promising tool for whole heart myocardial tissue characterization.

Keywords: 3D radial; free-running; inversion recovery; myocardial T1 mapping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Schematic diagram of the proposed free‐running myocardial 3D T1 mapping sequence. After inversion recovery (IR) preparation, spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) readout with low flip angle (θ) was performed using 3D golden angle radial trajectory. Tgap is the time between the IR pulse and the first excitation and Tex is the time interval between the last excitation in the SPGR readout and the next IR pulse. IRTR is the IR repetition time. (B) Data sorting process for reconstruction of multiple T1 contrasts for a given cardiac phase, which includes 3 steps: 1D respiratory motion estimation from k‐space center of all radial spokes and cardiac motion extraction from ECG log; respiratory motion correction of k‐space using motion parameters estimated by 3D translational image registration of respiratory bin images at diastole; binning the respiratory motion corrected k‐space into different T1 contrasts for a given cardiac phase
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) The 5 independent components (IC) extracted from the k‐space center of all spokes using independent component analysis. (B) The spectral power of the signal components in (A). (C) The IC (IC 4) with highest spectral power in the respiratory frequency range (0.1–0.5 Hz) is selected and band‐pass filtered and compared with respiration bellow. (D) Example of low‐resolution self‐navigated images of 5 respiratory bins from intermediate reconstruction for 3D translational respiratory motion estimation. Setting bin 5 as the reference, its difference with other respiratory bins are shown in the second row to demonstrate the extent of respiration‐induced motion of the heart in this subject. The difference images are demonstrated with the same gray level range
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) The singular values obtained by singular value decomposition of the dictionary simulated according to the imaging and reconstruction parameters of the proposed 3D T1 mapping technique using Bloch simulation. (B) The singular value images corresponding to the 3 largest singular values in (A) reconstructed by direct back projection and HD‐PROST (high‐dimensionality 3D patch‐based undersampled reconstruction) algorithm
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A and B) Phantom T1 maps of 2D inversion recovery spin echo (2D IR‐SE) and the proposed 3D T1 mapping approach. (C) Linear correlation of phantom T1 estimation with the proposed 3D method in comparison with reference 2D IR‐SE sequence. (D) Bland‐Altman plot showing the difference between the 2 methods and their average. The grey solid line indicates the mean difference, and the grey dotted lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals of limits of agreement
Figure 5
Figure 5
Proposed 3D T1 mapping technique at diastolic cardiac phase for a representative healthy subject. Eight short‐axis slices, from apex to base of the left ventricle and the reformatted long‐axis view are shown. Uniform T1 distribution across the myocardium can be observed
Figure 6
Figure 6
Short‐axis 2D MOLLI, 2D SASHA, and the proposed 3D T1 mapping results at diastolic cardiac phase for 2 healthy subjects. Long‐axis view is also included for the proposed 3D T1 mapping technique
Figure 7
Figure 7
(A) Mean septum T1 values of all 9 healthy subjects measured with 2D MOLLI, 2D SASHA, and the proposed free‐running 3D T1 mapping technique. (B) SDs of the septal T1 measurements from all the subjects for the 3 methods. The mean ± SD across all the subjects are shown on top of each method (**P < 0.01)
Figure 8
Figure 8
Representative diastolic and systolic T1 maps of basal, mid and apical short‐axis views using the proposed 3D T1 mapping sequence from 2 healthy subjects (A, B). Uniform myocardial T1 distribution can be observed on the T1 maps, both in diastole and systole.
Figure 9
Figure 9
(A) AHA bull's‐eye plots showing the myocardium T1 distribution across the left ventricle at diastole and systole with the proposed free‐running 3D T1 mapping technique. The mean values obtained by averaging across all the subjects are shown in each segment (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). (B) Box plots showing the median, 25th, and 75th percentiles and range of the diastolic and systolic T1 in each AHA segment. A, anterior; AS, anteroseptal; IS, inferoseptal; I, inferior; IL, inferolateral; AL, anterolateral; S, septal; L, lateral

References

    1. Patel AR, Kramer CM. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance in the diagnosis and prognosis of nonischemic cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(10PtA):1180–1193. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamlin SA, Henry TS, Little BP, Lerakis S, Stillman AE. Mapping the future of cardiac MR imaging: case‐based review of T1 and T2 mapping techniques. Radiographics. 2014;34:1594–1611. - PubMed
    1. Schelbert EB, Messroghli DR. State of the art: clinical applications of cardiac T1 mapping. Radiology. 2016;278:658–676. - PubMed
    1. Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM, et al. Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: a consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferreira VM, Piechnik SK, Dall'Armellina E, et al. Non‐contrast T1‐mapping detects acute myocardial edema with high diagnostic accuracy: a comparison to T2‐weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:42. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types