Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 May 15;85(1):70.
doi: 10.5334/aogh.2466.

Diagnostic Accuracy of FOBT and Colorectal Cancer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

Abdul Rahman Ramdzan  1   2 , Muhammad Aklil Abd Rahim  1   2 , Aznida Mohamad Zaki  1 , Zuraidah Zaidun  1 , Azmawati Mohammed Nawi  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic Accuracy of FOBT and Colorectal Cancer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

Abdul Rahman Ramdzan et al. Ann Glob Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer related death in the world after lung cancer. Early detection of CRC leads to improvement in cancer survival rate. In recent years, efforts have been made to discover a non-invasive screening marker of higher sensitivity and specificity. Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and genetic testing become alternative modalities to screen CRC in the population other than colonoscopy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of FOBT and genetic testing as screening tools in colorectal cancer.

Methods: A literature search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus was carried out. The search strategy was restricted to human subjects and studies are published in English. Data on sensitivity and specificity were extracted and pooled. Heterogeneity was assumed at significance level of p < 0.10 and was tested by chi squared. Degree of heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic, and values of less than 25% is considered as homogenous. All analyses were performed using the software Meta-Disc.

Results: A total of eleven studies were suitable for data synthesis and analysis. Five studies were analyzed for the accuracy of genetic testing, the pooled estimate for sensitivity and specificity were 71% (95% CI: 66, 75%) and 95% (95% CI: 93, 97%) respectively. Another group of studies which had been evaluated for the accuracy of FOBT, the pooled sensitivity was 31% (95% CI: 25, 38%) while the pooled specificity was 87% (95% CI: 86, 89%).

Conclusions: FOBTs is recommended to use as population-based screening tools for colorectal cancer while genetic testing should be focusing on patients with moderate and high risk individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow Chart of Studies Selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pooled Sensitivity FOBT.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pooled Specificity FOBT.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Cancer; fact sheet no 297 2014. Available from: http://www.who.int/medacentre/factsheets/fs297/en.
    1. American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2011–2013; 2013.
    1. Sung JJ, Ng SC, Chan FK, et al. An updated Asia Pacific Consensus Recommendations on colorectal cancer screening. Gut. 2015; 64(1): 121–32. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306503 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ, et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate- and high-risk groups (update from 2002). Gut. 2010; 59(5): 666–89. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2009.179804 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ministry of Health. Clinical Guidelines Practice: Management of Colorectal Cancer Malaysia Health Technology Assessment Section (MaHTAS) 2017.