Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 1;56(2):230-270.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz098.

2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support

Affiliations

2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support

Evgenij V Potapov et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Long-term mechanical circulatory support (LT-MCS) is an important treatment modality for patients with severe heart failure. Different devices are available, and many-sometimes contradictory-observations regarding patient selection, surgical techniques, perioperative management and follow-up have been published. With the growing expertise in this field, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) recognized a need for a structured multidisciplinary consensus about the approach to patients with LT-MCS. However, the evidence published so far is insufficient to allow for generation of meaningful guidelines complying with EACTS requirements. Instead, the EACTS presents an expert opinion in the LT-MCS field. This expert opinion addresses patient evaluation and preoperative optimization as well as management of cardiac and non-cardiac comorbidities. Further, extensive operative implantation techniques are summarized and evaluated by leading experts, depending on both patient characteristics and device selection. The faculty recognized that postoperative management is multidisciplinary and includes aspects of intensive care unit stay, rehabilitation, ambulatory care, myocardial recovery and end-of-life care and mirrored this fact in this paper. Additionally, the opinions of experts on diagnosis and management of adverse events including bleeding, cerebrovascular accidents and device malfunction are presented. In this expert consensus, the evidence for the complete management from patient selection to end-of-life care is carefully reviewed with the aim of guiding clinicians in optimizing management of patients considered for or supported by an LT-MCS device.

Keywords: Expert consensus; Heart failure; Left ventricular assist devices; Mechanical circulatory support.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. GHS. German Heart Society. Deutscher Herzbericht 2017 Sektorenübergreifende Versorgungsanalyse zur Kardiologie, Herzchirurgie und Kinderherzmedizin in Deutschland. e.V. DH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2017.
    1. Mehra MR, Goldstein DJ, Uriel N, Cleveland JC, Yuzefpolskaya M, Salerno C. et al. Two-year outcomes with a magnetically levitated cardiac pump in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1386–95. - PubMed
    1. Morshuis M, Garbade J, Zimpfer D, Shaw S, Lavee J, Gustafsson F. et al. Clinical outcomes with HeartMate 3TM left ventricular assist device as treatment for advanced heart failure: 12-month outcomes from the ELEVATE Registry. J Heart Lung Transplant 2018;37:S84. - PubMed
    1. Kirklin JK, Cantor R, Mohacsi P, Gummert J, De By T, Hannan MM. et al. First annual IMACS report: a global International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry for mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant 2016;35:407–12. - PubMed
    1. Baras Shreibati J, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Banerjee D, Owens DK, Hlatky MA.. Cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices in ambulatory patients with advanced heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2017;5:110–19. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms