Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 16;7(5):139.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7050139.

Host⁻Microbe Interactions and Gut Health in Poultry-Focus on Innate Responses

Affiliations
Review

Host⁻Microbe Interactions and Gut Health in Poultry-Focus on Innate Responses

Leon J Broom. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Commercial poultry are continually exposed to, frequently pathogenic, microorganisms, usually via mucosal surfaces such as the intestinal mucosa. Thus, understanding host-microbe interactions is vital. Many of these microorganisms may have no or limited contact with the host, while most of those interacting more meaningfully with the host will be dealt with by the innate immune response. Fundamentally, poultry have evolved to have immune responses that are generally appropriate and adequate for their acquired microbiomes, although this is challenged by commercial production practices. Innate immune cells and their functions, encompassing inflammatory responses, create the context for neutralising the stimulus and initiating resolution. Dysregulated inflammatory responses can be detrimental but, being a highly conserved biological process, inflammation is critical for host defence. Heterogeneity and functional plasticity of innate immune cells is underappreciated and offers the potential for (gut) health interventions, perhaps including exogenous opportunities to influence immune cell metabolism and thus function. New approaches could focus on identifying and enhancing decisive but less harmful immune processes, improving the efficiency of innate immune cells (e.g., targeted, efficient microbial killing) and promoting phenotypes that drive resolution of inflammation. Breeding strategies and suitable exogenous interventions offer potential solutions to enhance poultry gut health, performance and welfare.

Keywords: health; heterophil; immunity; immunometabolism; inflammatory response; intestine; macrophage; microorganism; poultry; resolution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Hornef M. Pathogens, commensal symbiont, and pathobionts: Discovery and functional effects on the host. ILAR J. 2015;56:159–162. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilv007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Couto Garcia C., Guabiraba R., Soriani F.M., Teixeira M.M. The development of anti-inflammatory drugs for infectious diseases. Discov. Med. 2010;55:479–488. - PubMed
    1. Nurmi E., Rantala M. New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature. 1973;241:210–211. doi: 10.1038/241210a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khiaosa-ard R., Zebeli Q. Diet-induced inflammation: From gut to metabolic organs and the consequences for the health and longevity of ruminants. Res. Vet. Sci. 2018;120:17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.08.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Juul-Madsen H.R., Viertlboeck B., Hartle S., Smith A.L., Gobel T.W. Innate immune responses. In: Schat K.A., Kaspers B., Kaiser P., editors. Avian Immunology. 2nd ed. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2014. pp. 121–147.

LinkOut - more resources