Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;84(2):359-371.
doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03863-w. Epub 2019 May 17.

Exposure time versus cytotoxicity for anticancer agents

Affiliations

Exposure time versus cytotoxicity for anticancer agents

David M Evans et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Time is a critical factor in drug action. The duration of inhibition of the target or residence time of the drug molecule on the target often guides drug scheduling.

Methods: The effects of time on the concentration-dependent cytotoxicity of approved and investigational agents [300 compounds] were examined in the NCI60 cell line panel in 2D at 2, 3, 7 and in 3D 11 days.

Results: There was a moderate positive linear relationship between data from the 2-day NCI60 screen and the 3-, 7- and 11-day and a strong positive linear relationship between 3-, 7- and 11-day luminescence screen IC50s by Pearson correlation analysis. Cell growth inhibition by agents selective for a specific cell cycle phase plateaued when susceptible cells were growth inhibited or killed. As time increased the depth of cell growth inhibition increased without change in the IC50. DNA interactive agents had decreasing IC50s with increasing exposure time. Epigenetic agents required longer exposure times; several were only cytotoxic after 11 days' exposure. For HDAC inhibitors, time had little or no effect on concentration response. There were potency differences amongst the three BET bromodomain inhibitors tested, and an exposure duration effect. The PARP inhibitors, rucaparib, niraparib, and veliparib reached IC50s < 10 μM in some cell lines after 11 days.

Conclusions: The results suggest that variations in compound exposure time may reflect either mechanism of action or compound chemical half-life. The activity of slow-acting compounds may optimally be assessed in spheroid models that can be monitored over prolonged incubation times.

Keywords: Concentration times time; CxT; Epigenetic agents; NCI60.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest The authors state that they have no conflicts of interest to report. The study does not involve human subjects or use of animals in research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-019-03863-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Concentration response curves in three representative NCI60 panel cell lines after compound exposure for 2 days (blue), 3 days (red), 7 days (yellow) or 11 days (green) for the DHFR inhibitor methotrexate, TS inhibitor raltitrexed, and DNA-damaging agents doxorubicin, mitomycin C, etoposide and topotecan
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Concentration response curves in three representative NCI60 panel cell lines after compound exposure for 2 days (blue), 3 days (red), 7 days (yellow) or 11 days (green) for the DNA methyltransferase inhibitors RX-3117, SGI-1027, azacytidine and decitabine
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Concentration response curves in three representative NCI60 panel cell lines after compound exposure for 2 days (blue), 3 days (red), 7 days (yellow) or 11 days (green) for the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors belinostat, quisinostat, panobinostat, abexinostat, JNJ-16241199, and romidepsin
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a Concentration response curves in three representative NCI60 panel cell lines after compound exposure for 2 days (blue), 3 days (red), 7 days (yellow) or 11 days (green) for the EZH2 inhibitors GSK-126 and EPZ-5687, the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor, and the DNA polymerase inhibitors cytarabine and clofarabine. b Concentration response curves in three representative NCI60 panel cell lines after compound exposure for 2 days (blue), 3 days (red), 7 days (yellow) or 11 days (green) for the BET bromodomain inhibitors MK8628, BET-BAY-002 and GSK525762 and the gamma-secretase inhibitors MK-0752 and LY-450139
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a Concentration response curves in three representative NCI60 panel cell lines after compound exposure for 2 days (blue), 3 days (red), 7 days (yellow) or 11 days (green) for the PARP inhibitors rucaparib, niraparib, olaparib, talazoparib, and veliparib. b Concentration response curves in three representative NCI60 panel cell lines after compound exposure for 2 days (blue), 3 days (red), 7 days (yellow) or 11 days (green) for the SMO inhibitors saridegib and LEQ-506 and the IAP inhibitors birinapant and LCL-161
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a Concentration response curves in three representative NCI60 panel cell lines after compound exposure for 2 days (blue), 3 days (red), 7 days (yellow) or 11 days (green) for the PARP inhibitors rucaparib, niraparib, olaparib, talazoparib, and veliparib. b Concentration response curves in three representative NCI60 panel cell lines after compound exposure for 2 days (blue), 3 days (red), 7 days (yellow) or 11 days (green) for the SMO inhibitors saridegib and LEQ-506 and the IAP inhibitors birinapant and LCL-161

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eastman A (2017) Improving anticancer drug development begins with cell culture: misinformation perpetrated by the misuse of cytotoxicity assays. Oncotarget 8:8854–8866 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perego P, Hempel G, Linder S, Bradshaw TD, Larsen AK, Peters GJ, Phillips RM, on behalf of the EORTC PAMM Group (2018) Cellular pharmacology studies of anticancer agents: recommendations from the EORTC-PAMM group. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 81:427–41 - PubMed
    1. Liston DR, Davis M (2017) Clinically relevant concentrations of anticancer drugs: a guide for nonclinical studies. Clin Cancer Res 23:3489–3498 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Henderson ES, Adamson RH, Denham C, Oliverio VT (1965) The metabolic fate of tritiated methotrexate I. absorption, excretion and distribution in mice, rats, dogs and monkeys. Cancer Res 25:1008–1017 - PubMed
    1. Ludwig R, Alberts DS (1984) Chemical and biological stability of anticancer drugs used in a human tumor clonogenic assay. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 12:142–145 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances