Running Biomechanics in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 31102111
- DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01120-x
Running Biomechanics in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: A return to running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is critical to the clinical success of any cutting and pivoting athlete who wishes to return to sport. Knowledge of specific alterations during running after ACL-R is required to optimise rehabilitation for improving outcomes and long-term disability.
Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to summarise kinematic, kinetic and muscle activation data during running after ACL-R and the intrinsic factors (e.g. surgical technique and strength asymmetries) affecting running biomechanics.
Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to 10 December, 2018. The search identified studies comparing kinematic, kinetic or muscle activation data during running between the involved limb and contralateral or control limbs. Studies analysing the effect of intrinsic factors in the ACL-R group were also included. Risk of bias was assessed, qualitative and quantitative analyses performed, and levels of evidence determined.
Results: A total of 1993 papers were identified and 25 were included for analysis. Pooled analyses reported a deficit of knee flexion motion and internal knee extension moment, compared with both contralateral or control limbs, during the stance phase of running from 3 months to 5 years after ACL-R (strong evidence). Inconsistent results were found for both peak vertical ground reaction force and impact forces after ACL-R. Patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint contact forces differed from both contralateral or control limbs up until at least 2.5 years after ACL-R and moderate evidence indicated no difference for muscle activations during moderate speed running. Quadriceps and hamstring strength asymmetries, and knee function, but not surgical techniques, were likely to be associated with both knee kinematics and kinetics during running after ACL-R.
Conclusion: After ACL-R, knee flexion motion and internal knee extension moment are the most affected variables and are consistently smaller in the injured limb during running when pooling evidence. Clinicians should be aware that these deficits do not appear to resolve with time and, thus, specific clinical interventions may be needed to reduce long-term disability.
Systematic review registration: Registered in PROSPERO 2017, CRD42017077130.
Similar articles
-
Quadriceps Strength Symmetry Does Not Modify Gait Mechanics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Return-to-Sport Training.Am J Sports Med. 2021 Feb;49(2):417-425. doi: 10.1177/0363546520980079. Epub 2020 Dec 29. Am J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 33373534 Free PMC article.
-
Young Athletes With Quadriceps Femoris Strength Asymmetry at Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Demonstrate Asymmetric Single-Leg Drop-Landing Mechanics.Am J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2727-37. doi: 10.1177/0363546515602016. Epub 2015 Sep 10. Am J Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 26359376
-
Report of the Clinical and Functional Primary Outcomes in Men of the ACL-SPORTS Trial: Similar Outcomes in Men Receiving Secondary Prevention With and Without Perturbation Training 1 and 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2523-2534. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5280-2. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 28224443 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Strength, rate of force development, power and reactive strength in adult male athletic populations post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - A systematic review and meta-analysis.Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Jan;47:91-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.11.024. Epub 2020 Nov 10. Phys Ther Sport. 2021. PMID: 33232907
-
No sign of weakness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hip and calf muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament injury.Br J Sports Med. 2024 Apr 25;58(9):500-510. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107536. Br J Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 38537939
Cited by
-
Knee Strength Assessment and Clinical Evaluation Could Predict Return to Running after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Procedure.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;19(20):13396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013396. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36293974 Free PMC article.
-
Pain Early After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction is Associated With 6-Month Loading Mechanics During Running.Sports Health. 2023 Nov-Dec;15(6):908-916. doi: 10.1177/19417381221139478. Epub 2022 Dec 14. Sports Health. 2023. PMID: 36519181 Free PMC article.
-
fMRI Activation in Sensorimotor Regions at 6 Weeks After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2025 Mar;53(4):791-800. doi: 10.1177/03635465251313808. Epub 2025 Feb 4. Am J Sports Med. 2025. PMID: 39905651 Free PMC article.
-
Which assessments are used to analyze neuromuscular control by electromyography after an anterior cruciate ligament injury to determine readiness to return to sports? A systematic review.BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021 Nov 8;13(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13102-021-00370-5. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 34749813 Free PMC article.
-
Neuromuscular activity of the lower-extremities during running, landing and changing-of-direction movements in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of electromyographic studies.J Exp Orthop. 2023 Apr 14;10(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00603-1. J Exp Orthop. 2023. PMID: 37058177 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical