Does cerebellar non-invasive brain stimulation affect corticospinal excitability in healthy individuals? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis
- PMID: 31102706
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.05.025
Does cerebellar non-invasive brain stimulation affect corticospinal excitability in healthy individuals? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis
Abstract
Numerous studies have indicated that non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) of the cerebellum could modulate corticospinal excitability (CSE) in young healthy individuals. However, there is no systematic review and meta-analysis that clarifies the effects of cerebellar NIBS on CSE. The aim of this study was to provide a meta-analytic summary of the effects of cerebellar NIBS on CSE. Seven search engines were used to identify any trial evaluating CSE before and after one session of cerebellar NIBS in healthy individuals up to June 2018. Twenty-six studies investigating the corticospinal responses following cerebellar NIBS were included. Meta-analysis was used to pool the findings from included studies. Effects were expressed as mean differences (MD) and the standard deviation (SD). Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool. Meta-analysis found that paired associative stimulation (PAS) with 2 ms interval, a combination of PAS with 21.5 ms interval and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with a frequency of < 5 Hz increase CSE (P PAS2 < 0.00001, P PAS21.5 +a-tDCS = 0.02, P rTMS = 0.04). However, continuous theta burst stimulation, a combination of PAS with 25 ms interval and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, and PAS with a 6 ms interval decreased CSE (P PAS6 < 0.00001, P cTBS < 0.00001, P PAS25 +a-tDCS = 0.003). The results of this review show that cerebellar NIBS techniques are a promising tool for increasing CSE.
Keywords: Non-invasive brain stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; cerebellum; corticospinal excitability; motor evoked potential; transcranial direct current stimulation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Cerebellar rTMS and PAS effectively induce cerebellar plasticity.Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3070. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82496-7. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33542291 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of a Single Session of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Balance in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis.Brain Connect. 2021 Nov;11(9):695-716. doi: 10.1089/brain.2020.0872. Epub 2021 Sep 3. Brain Connect. 2021. PMID: 33798002
-
Multimodal response-predictor analysis for three non-invasive brain stimulation protocols.Brain Res. 2025 Mar 1;1850:149372. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149372. Epub 2024 Dec 5. Brain Res. 2025. PMID: 39645141
-
Within-session repeated a-tDCS: the effects of repetition rate and inter-stimulus interval on corticospinal excitability and motor performance.Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Sep;125(9):1809-18. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Jan 29. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014. PMID: 24582469
-
A meta-analysis of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) effects on cerebellar-associated cognitive processes.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Feb;157:105509. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105509. Epub 2023 Dec 13. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024. PMID: 38101590 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease.Cerebellum. 2022 Jun;21(3):333-349. doi: 10.1007/s12311-021-01297-w. Epub 2021 Jul 7. Cerebellum. 2022. PMID: 34232470 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cerebellar rTMS and PAS effectively induce cerebellar plasticity.Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3070. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82496-7. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33542291 Free PMC article.
-
Posture enhancement with cerebellum transcranial electrical stimulation: a systematic review of current methods and findings.Exp Brain Res. 2024 May;242(5):991-1009. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06808-9. Epub 2024 Mar 28. Exp Brain Res. 2024. PMID: 38546838
-
Cerebellar transcranial current stimulation - An intraindividual comparison of different techniques.Front Neurosci. 2022 Sep 15;16:987472. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.987472. eCollection 2022. Front Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36188449 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of concurrent bilateral anodal tDCS of primary motor cortex and cerebellum on corticospinal excitability: a randomized, double-blind sham-controlled study.Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Sep;227(7):2395-2408. doi: 10.1007/s00429-022-02533-7. Epub 2022 Aug 19. Brain Struct Funct. 2022. PMID: 35984496 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous