Management of high complexity renal masses in partial nephrectomy: A multicenter analysis
- PMID: 31103334
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.04.019
Management of high complexity renal masses in partial nephrectomy: A multicenter analysis
Abstract
Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of performing partial nephrectomy (PN) on patients with high nephrometry score tumors.
Patients and methods: We used a prospectively maintained multi-institutional kidney cancer database to identify 144 patients with R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score ≥10 who underwent PN for a cT1-cT2 renal mass. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, tumor characteristics, perioperative, and pathological outcomes were analyzed and reported. Trifecta achievement, defined by warm ischemia time <25 minutes, no perioperative complications, and negative surgical margins, was the primary outcome. We assessed the relationship of baseline clinical and tumor characteristics data to trifecta achievement and perioperative complications.
Results: Baseline median eGFR was 84.57 ml/min/1.73 m2, with 119 (84.39%) patients having normal baseline kidney function. The median clinical tumor size was 4.95 cm, with 74 (51.75%) being completely endophytic and 58 (41.73%) located on the hilum. The median ischemia time was 20 minutes. Median estimated blood loss was 150 ml. Twelve patients (8.33%) had intraoperative complications. No patient had a conversion to open surgery. Postoperative, perioperative, and major complication rate were 10.42%, 17.3%, and 2.34% respectively. Thirty-six patients (37.89%) developed postoperative acute kidney injury and 28 (20.90%) developed new-onset CKD at a median follow-up of 6 months. Eight patients (5.56%) had a positive surgical margin. Trifecta was achieved in 89 (61.81%) patients. There was no significant difference in baseline, clinical, and tumor characteristics between those that achieved trifecta and in those where trifecta was not. Pathologic tumor stage was the only factor significantly associated with trifecta achievement (P = 0.025).
Conclusion: In treating complex renal tumors, PN should be performed when possible. Although this remains a challenging procedure, with experience and appropriate case selection, the trifecta outcome can be achieved in a significant number of patients with high renal score lesions.
Keywords: Nephrometry; Partial Nephrectomy; RENAL score; Renal cell carcinoma; Trifecta.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Complex renal masses: partial or no partial nephrectomy?Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(Suppl 8):S312. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.10.03. Ann Transl Med. 2019. PMID: 32016031 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The limits of complex partial nephrectomy: are there any?Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(Suppl 8):S345. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.97. Ann Transl Med. 2019. PMID: 32016063 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
R-LESS partial nephrectomy trifecta outcome is inferior to multiport robotic partial nephrectomy: comparative analysis.Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):512-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.058. Epub 2013 Nov 11. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24275311
-
Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: A multicenter analysis.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 May;47(5):1179-1186. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Aug 16. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 32868149
-
Predictive Factors for Achieving Superior Pentafecta Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma.J Endourol. 2017 Dec;31(12):1231-1236. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0369. Epub 2017 Nov 20. J Endourol. 2017. PMID: 29048228
-
Trifecta Outcomes in Open, Laparoscopy or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Does the Surgical Approach Matter?J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2019 May 13;6(1):8-12. doi: 10.15586/jkcvhl.2019.115. eCollection 2019. J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2019. PMID: 31149561 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Single-Port robot assisted partial nephrectomy: initial experience and technique with the da Vinci Single-Port platform (IDEAL Phase 1).Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Apr;74(2):216-224. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.03919-9. Epub 2021 Mar 26. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022. PMID: 33769009 Review.
Cited by
-
Three-dimensional imaging reconstruction of the kidney's anatomy for a tailored minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: A pilot study.Asian J Urol. 2022 Jul;9(3):263-271. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jun 20. Asian J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36035345 Free PMC article.
-
Technologic advances in robot-assisted nephron sparing surgery: a narrative review.Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Jul 31;12(7):1184-1198. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-107. Epub 2023 Jul 17. Transl Androl Urol. 2023. PMID: 37554533 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Implementation of surgical rehearsal utilizing patient specific hydrogel kidney phantoms prior to complex renal cancer surgery: a pilot study.World J Urol. 2024 Oct 29;42(1):602. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05301-w. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39470833
-
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for moderate to highly complex renal masses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian J Urol. 2022 Jul-Sep;38(3):174-183. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_393_21. Epub 2022 Jul 1. Indian J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35983124 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perioperative outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal masses: A Vattikuti Collective Quality Initiative database study.Indian J Urol. 2022 Oct-Dec;38(4):288-295. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_154_22. Epub 2022 Oct 1. Indian J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36568454 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous