Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;78(1):77-86.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 16.

Robot-assisted Level III-IV Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: Initial Series with Step-by-step Procedures and 1-yr Outcomes

Baojun Wang  1 , Qingbo Huang  1 , Kan Liu  1 , Yang Fan  1 , Cheng Peng  1 , Liangyou Gu  1 , Taoping Shi  1 , Peng Zhang  1 , Wenzheng Chen  1 , Songliang Du  1 , Shaoxi Niu  1 , Rong Liu  2 , Guodong Zhao  2 , Qiuyang Li  3 , Cangsong Xiao  4 , Rong Wang  4 , Shuanglei Li  4 , Maoqiang Wang  5 , Fengyong Liu  5 , Haiyi Wang  6 , Hongzhao Li  7 , Xin Ma  8 , Xu Zhang  9
Affiliations

Robot-assisted Level III-IV Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: Initial Series with Step-by-step Procedures and 1-yr Outcomes

Baojun Wang et al. Eur Urol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Level III-IV robot-assisted inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombectomy (RA-IVCT) has been reported in limited series.

Objective: To report our initial series of level III-IV RA-IVCT with step-by-step procedures and 1-yr outcomes.

Design, setting, and participants: From November 2014 to January 2018, 13 patients with level III-IV IVC tumor thrombi underwent RA-IVCT with a minimum of 1-yr follow-up.

Surgical procedure: Level III RA-IVCT requires liver mobilization and clamping of first porta hepatis (FPH), and suprahepatic and infradiaphragmatic IVC. Level IV RA-IVCT requires establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Thoracoscopy-assisted thrombectomy was performed for the intra-atrium part of the thrombus under CPB. Infradiaphragmatic RA-IVCT was completed in a manner similar to that of level III RA-IVCT.

Measurements: Detailed techniques were described for various scenarios. Baseline and perioperative outcomes were reported, and descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

Results and limitations: Median operative time was 465 (interquartile range [IQR]: 338-567) min. Median estimated intraoperative blood loss was 2000 (IQR: 1000-3000) ml. The rates of intraoperative blood transfusion and postoperative transformation to the intensive care unit ward were 92.3% and 100%, respectively. Median FPH blocking time was 40 (IQR: 25-60) min and the CPB time was 72 (IQR: 51-87) min. Three cases had grade IV complications, including two vascular injuries that were treated with intraoperative endoscopic sutures and one perioperative death. The perioperative mortality rate was 7.7%. During an 18-mo follow-up, two patients died and one patient progressed.

Conclusions: Although the risks involved are high, level III-IV RA-IVCT is feasible and serves as an alternative minimally invasive method for selected patients. It also requires more complex techniques and multidisciplinary cooperation.

Patient summary: We studied the treatment of patients with level III-IV inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombi using a robotic approach. This technique was feasible for well-selected patients. However, level III-IV robot-assisted IVC thrombectomy requires more complex techniques and multidisciplinary cooperation.

Keywords: Inferior vena cava; Robotics; Thrombectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types