Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 8;374(1776):20180365.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0365.

How decision makers can use quantitative approaches to guide outbreak responses

Affiliations

How decision makers can use quantitative approaches to guide outbreak responses

Oliver Morgan. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Decision makers are responsible for directing staffing, logistics, selecting public health interventions, communicating to professionals and the public, planning future response needs, and establishing strategic and tactical priorities along with their funding requirements. Decision makers need to rapidly synthesize data from different experts across multiple disciplines, bridge data gaps and translate epidemiological analysis into an operational set of decisions for disease control. Analytic approaches can be defined for specific response phases: investigation, scale-up and control. These approaches include: improved applications of quantitative methods to generate insightful epidemiological descriptions of outbreaks; robust investigations of causal agents and risk factors; tools to assess response needs; identifying and monitoring optimal interventions or combinations of interventions; and forecasting for response planning. Data science and quantitative approaches can improve decision-making in outbreak response. To realize these benefits, we need to develop a structured approach that will improve the quality and timeliness of data collected during outbreaks, establish analytic teams within the response structure and define a research agenda for data analytics in outbreak response. This article is part of the theme issue 'Modelling infectious disease outbreaks in humans, animals and plants: epidemic forecasting and control'. This theme issue is linked with the earlier issue 'Modelling infectious disease outbreaks in humans, animals and plants: approaches and important themes'.

Keywords: decision-making; infectious diseases; modelling; outbreaks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I declare I have no competing interests.

References

    1. Heesterbeek H, et al. 2015. Modeling infectious disease dynamics in the complex landscape of global health. Science 347, aaa4339 (10.1126/science.aaa4339) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi YH, Jit M, Gay N, Cox A, Garnett GP, Edmunds WJ. 2010. Transmission dynamic modelling of the impact of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United Kingdom. Vaccine 28, 4091–4102. (10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.125) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Menzies NA, et al. 2016. Cost-effectiveness and resource implications of aggressive action on tuberculosis in China, India, and South Africa: a combined analysis of nine models. Lancet Glob. Health 4, e816–e826. (10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30265-0) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacobsen MM, Walensky RP. 2016. Modeling and cost-effectiveness in HIV prevention. Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 13, 64–75. (10.1007/s11904-016-0303-2) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meltzer MI, Atkins CY, Santibanez S, Knust B, Petersen BW, Ervin ED, Nichol ST, Damon IK, Washington ML. 2014. Estimating the future number of cases in the Ebola epidemic—Liberia and Sierra Leone, 2014–2015. MMWR Suppl. 63, 1–14. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources