Health-related messages in the labeling of processed meat products: a market evaluation
- PMID: 31105508
- PMCID: PMC6503640
- DOI: 10.29219/fnr.v63.3358
Health-related messages in the labeling of processed meat products: a market evaluation
Abstract
Background: Food labeling is an important communication tool for the exposure of nutrition information in foods.
Objective: The presence of labeling messages related to nutrients, health properties, allergens, and additives in meat products marketed in Spain was analyzed in this work. The data collection was done through the web pages of six Spanish meat industries, and 642 products were gathered. The following labeling information was collected: the presence of nutrition claims, the presence of health claims, messages indicating the absence of additives, and those reporting the absence or presence of allergenic substances.
Results: A total of 1,254 messages were found with the following distribution: 72% were related to the presence/absence of allergens, 19% were nutrition claims, 8% were messages related to the absence of additives, and only 0.4% were health claims. Fat was the nutrient most frequently referred in the nutrition claims, accounting for a 63.5% of this type of claims, with the expression 'low-fat', as the most used (42% of total nutrition claims). Prevalence of processed meat products that showed nutrition claims was 29%, whereas the percentage of products that showed information about allergenic compounds was 83%.
Conclusion: This work provides information about the presence of health-related messages in a high number of meat products, which could be useful as a tool for marketing purposes or for consumer trends evaluation studies.
Keywords: additives; allergens; health claims; nutrition claims; packaged foods.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Nutritional marketing of plant-based meat-analogue products: an exploratory study of front-of-pack and website claims in the USA.Public Health Nutr. 2021 Oct;24(14):4430-4441. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021002792. Epub 2021 Jun 28. Public Health Nutr. 2021. PMID: 34176542 Free PMC article.
-
Nutrition and related claims used on packaged Australian foods--implications for regulation.Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2003;12(2):138-50. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2003. PMID: 12810403
-
Status of nutrition labeling, health claims, and nutrient content claims for processed foods: 1997 Food Label and Package Survey.J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Sep;100(9):1057-62. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00308-4. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000. PMID: 11019354
-
Nutrition Labeling for Foods: Which Approaches Are Useful?World Rev Nutr Diet. 2020;121:166-175. doi: 10.1159/000507487. Epub 2020 Oct 6. World Rev Nutr Diet. 2020. PMID: 33502352 Review.
-
Detection of allergenic additives in processed meat products.J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Oct;98(13):4807-4815. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9083. Epub 2018 Jun 7. J Sci Food Agric. 2018. PMID: 29675958 Review.
Cited by
-
Influence of Healthy Brand and Diagnosticity of Brand Name on Subjective Ratings of High- and Low-Calorie Food.Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 13;13(1):70. doi: 10.3390/bs13010070. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36661642 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Storytelling about an Innovative and Sustainable Organic Beef Production System on Product Acceptance, Preference, and Satisfaction.Foods. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):2940. doi: 10.3390/foods13182940. Foods. 2024. PMID: 39335869 Free PMC article.
-
Red Wine and Garlic as a Possible Alternative to Minimize the Use of Nitrite for Controlling Clostridium Sporogenes and Salmonella in a Cured Sausage: Safety and Sensory Implications.Foods. 2020 Feb 17;9(2):206. doi: 10.3390/foods9020206. Foods. 2020. PMID: 32079181 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kraus A. Factors influencing the decisions to buy and consume functional food. Br Food J 2015; 117(6): S.1622–36. doi:10.1108/BFJ-08-2014-0301 [cited 25 April 2019] - DOI
-
- Regulation 1169/2011 Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on food information to the consumer and amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repeal. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/1169/oj [cited 25 April 2019]
-
- Asioli D, Aschemann-Witzel J, Caputo V, Vecchio R, Annunziata A, Næs T, et al. . Making sense of the ‘clean label’ trends: a review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications. Food Res Int 2017; 99: 58–71. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.022 [cited 25 April 2019] - DOI - PubMed
-
- Katz B, Williams LA. Cleaning up processed foods. Food Technol 2011; 65(12): 33–7. [cited 25 April 2019]
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources