Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 2:63.
doi: 10.29219/fnr.v63.3358. eCollection 2019.

Health-related messages in the labeling of processed meat products: a market evaluation

Diana Ansorena  1 , Sandivel Cama  1 , Marta Alejandre  1 , Iciar Astiasarán  1
Affiliations

Health-related messages in the labeling of processed meat products: a market evaluation

Diana Ansorena et al. Food Nutr Res. .

Abstract

Background: Food labeling is an important communication tool for the exposure of nutrition information in foods.

Objective: The presence of labeling messages related to nutrients, health properties, allergens, and additives in meat products marketed in Spain was analyzed in this work. The data collection was done through the web pages of six Spanish meat industries, and 642 products were gathered. The following labeling information was collected: the presence of nutrition claims, the presence of health claims, messages indicating the absence of additives, and those reporting the absence or presence of allergenic substances.

Results: A total of 1,254 messages were found with the following distribution: 72% were related to the presence/absence of allergens, 19% were nutrition claims, 8% were messages related to the absence of additives, and only 0.4% were health claims. Fat was the nutrient most frequently referred in the nutrition claims, accounting for a 63.5% of this type of claims, with the expression 'low-fat', as the most used (42% of total nutrition claims). Prevalence of processed meat products that showed nutrition claims was 29%, whereas the percentage of products that showed information about allergenic compounds was 83%.

Conclusion: This work provides information about the presence of health-related messages in a high number of meat products, which could be useful as a tool for marketing purposes or for consumer trends evaluation studies.

Keywords: additives; allergens; health claims; nutrition claims; packaged foods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution total number of health-related messages (n = 1,254) present in the meat products. Between parentheses, the number of messages reported for each type.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kraus A. Factors influencing the decisions to buy and consume functional food. Br Food J 2015; 117(6): S.1622–36. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-08-2014-0301 [cited 25 April 2019] - DOI
    1. Cavaliere A, De Marchi E, Banterle A. Investigation on the role of consumer health orientation in the use of food labels. Public Health 2017; 147: 119–27. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.02.011 [cited 25 April 2019] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Regulation 1169/2011 Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on food information to the consumer and amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repeal. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/1169/oj [cited 25 April 2019]
    1. Asioli D, Aschemann-Witzel J, Caputo V, Vecchio R, Annunziata A, Næs T, et al. Making sense of the ‘clean label’ trends: a review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications. Food Res Int 2017; 99: 58–71. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.022 [cited 25 April 2019] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Katz B, Williams LA. Cleaning up processed foods. Food Technol 2011; 65(12): 33–7. [cited 25 April 2019]