How Preferred Brands Relate to the Self: The Effect of Brand Preference, Product Involvement, and Information Valence on Brand-Related Memory
- PMID: 31105609
- PMCID: PMC6499029
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00783
How Preferred Brands Relate to the Self: The Effect of Brand Preference, Product Involvement, and Information Valence on Brand-Related Memory
Abstract
This study adopted the paradigm of the self-reference effect to explore how brand preference, product involvement, and information valence affects brand-related memory by three experiments. Experiment 1 examined memory differences between positive/negative information of self-/other-preferred brands. Results showed increased memory of positive words (i.e., the effect of information valence) in the self-preferred brand group, yet memory of self-preferred brands was poorer than that of other-preferred brands. Experiment 2 examined effects of degree of brand preference and information valence, and revealed a positive association between degree of preference and memory of brand-related positive words. Experiment 3 explored the effects of brand preference and product involvement. Results showed that the memory of high-preference brands was stronger in the high-involvement group. Additionally, product involvement demonstrated a significant positive correlation with memory. The observed effects of information valence, especially in self-preference (Experiment 1) and high-preference (Experiment 2) conditions, can be explained by self-schema and mnemic neglect theories. The increased memory of highly preferred brands in a high-involvement condition can be explained by intimacy and self-expansion models (Experiment 3).
Keywords: brand preference; information valence; product involvement; self-expansion model; self-reference effect.
Similar articles
-
Things Become Appealing When I Win: Neural Evidence of the Influence of Competition Outcomes on Brand Preference.Front Neurosci. 2018 Oct 26;12:779. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00779. eCollection 2018. Front Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30416426 Free PMC article.
-
"Me" means more than "good": stimuli's self-relevance matters more than valence in shaping evaluative learning via the self.Cogn Emot. 2023 May-Jun;37(3):544-558. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2023.2183936. Epub 2023 Mar 8. Cogn Emot. 2023. PMID: 36890715
-
Brand Suicide? Memory and Liking of Negative Brand Names.PLoS One. 2016 Mar 29;11(3):e0151628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151628. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27023872 Free PMC article.
-
Neuroeconomics: in search of the neural representation of brands.Prog Brain Res. 2009;178:241-52. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17817-2. Prog Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19874974 Review.
-
Embracing strengths and avoiding weaknesses: a meta-analysis of the mnemic neglect effect.Memory. 2025 Feb;33(2):278-294. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2433680. Epub 2024 Nov 28. Memory. 2025. PMID: 39607885 Review.
Cited by
-
Exploring the role of digital media dependency on the relationship between personal involvement and flashbulb memory during the pandemic: Empirical evidence from Mainland China.Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 11;13:985287. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.985287. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36438306 Free PMC article.
-
Firm innovation activities and consumer brand loyalty: A path to business sustainability in Asia.Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 25;13:942048. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.942048. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35959050 Free PMC article.
-
How consumer group communication influences brand memory during product injury crises.Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:922643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922643. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36186338 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Differential Effects of Online Reviews on Film's Box-Office Success: Source Identity and Brand Equity From an Integrated Perspective.Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 21;11:217. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00217. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32153457 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aaker J., Fournier S. (1995). A brand as a character, a partner and a person: three perspectives on the question of brand personality. Adv. Consum. Res. 22 391–395.
-
- Ahluwalia R., Burnkrant R. E., Unnava H. R. (2000). Consumer response to negative publicity: the moderating role of commitment. J. Mark. Res. 37 203–214. 10.1509/jmkr.37.2.203.18734 - DOI
-
- Angle J. W., Forehand M. R. (2016). It’s not us, it’s you: how threatening self-brand association leads to brand pursuit. Int. J. Res. Mark. 33 183–197. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.08.003 - DOI
-
- Aron A., Aron E. N. (1986). Love and the Expansion of Self: Understanding Attraction and Satisfaction. New York, NY: Hemisphere.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources