Contact sensitization to cosmetic series of allergens in patients with rosacea: A prospective controlled study
- PMID: 31106952
- DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12989
Contact sensitization to cosmetic series of allergens in patients with rosacea: A prospective controlled study
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have documented the cosmetic allergic contact dermatitis due to common cosmetic allergens in standard series and various cosmetic products used in rosacea patients; however, the prevalence of contact sensitization to other cosmetic allergens other than those in standard series is largely unknown.
Aims: To assess the prevalence of contact sensitization to a European cosmetic series of allergens (Chemotechnique Diagnostics AB, Malmö, Sweden) in rosacea patients and to compare this with the prevalence observed in general population.
Methods: In this prospective monocenter study, 103 patients with rosacea and 104 control subjects were investigated for contact sensitizations via patch testing the cosmetic series including 49 allergens.
Results: At least one positive allergic reaction was observed in 62 (60.2%) rosacea patients, and in 25 (24.0%) control subjects. Compared with control subjects, rosacea patients were statistically more likely to have positive patch tests. The most common allergens giving positive results were octyl gallate (10.68%), dodecyl gallate (8.74%), tert-Butylhydroquinone (7.77%), thimerosal (6.80%), euxyl K400 (6.80%), cocamidopropyl betaine (5.83%), and 2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-cresol (4.85%).
Conclusions: This study shows that rosacea patients show a strikingly high prevalence of contact sensitization to cosmetic allergens. We recommend the additional use of cosmetic series for patch testing, and the careful use of cosmetics in rosacea patients if cosmetic contact sensitivity is suspected.
Keywords: contact allergy; cosmetic patch; cosmetics; rosacea.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Contact sensitization to cosmetic series of allergens in a general population in Beijing.J Cosmet Dermatol. 2014 Mar;13(1):68-71. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12078. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2014. PMID: 24641608
-
Contact sensitization to cosmetic series of allergens in female patients with rosacea: A prospective controlled study in China.J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Aug;20(8):2627-2634. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13902. Epub 2020 Dec 22. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 33350569
-
[Contact allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics].Med Pr. 2006;57(3):245-9. Med Pr. 2006. PMID: 17125030 Polish.
-
Allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics.Dermatol Clin. 2014 Jan;32(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2013.09.006. Dermatol Clin. 2014. PMID: 24267417 Review.
-
Allergic contact dermatitis to preservatives and fragrances in cosmetics.Skin Therapy Lett. 2011 Apr;16(4):1-4. Skin Therapy Lett. 2011. PMID: 21611680 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Delayed Contact Hypersensitivity in Patients with Rosacea.Skin Appendage Disord. 2024 Jun;10(3):207-214. doi: 10.1159/000536246. Epub 2024 Feb 2. Skin Appendage Disord. 2024. PMID: 38835717 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Vemuri RC, Gundamaraju R, Sekaran SD, Manikam R. Major pathophysiological correlations of rosacea: a complete clinical appraisal. Int J Med Sci. 2015;12:387-396.
-
- van Zuuren EJ, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, van der Linden MM, Charland L. Interventions for rosacea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4:CD003262.
-
- Addor FA. Skin barrier in rosacea. An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91:59-63.
-
- Darlenski R, Kazandjieva J, Tsankov N, Fluhr JW. Acute irritant threshold correlates with barrier function, skin hydration and contact hypersensitivity in atopic dermatitis and rosacea. Exp Dermatol. 2013;22:752-753.
-
- McFadden JP, Basketter DA. Contact allergy, irritancy and ‘danger’. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;42:123-127.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical