Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;75(5):649-659.
doi: 10.1111/his.13922. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

Problems in the reproducibility of classification of small lung adenocarcinoma: an international interobserver study

Angela R Shih  1 , Hironori Uruga  1   2 , Emine Bozkurtlar  3 , Jin-Haeng Chung  4 , Lida P Hariri  1 , Yuko Minami  5 , He Wang  6 , Akihiko Yoshizawa  7 , Alona Muzikansky  1 , Andre L Moreira  8 , Mari Mino-Kenudson  1
Affiliations

Problems in the reproducibility of classification of small lung adenocarcinoma: an international interobserver study

Angela R Shih et al. Histopathology. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Aims: The 2015 WHO classification for lung adenocarcinoma (ACA) provides criteria for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (INV), but differentiating these entities can be difficult. As our understanding of prognostic significance increases, inconsistent classification is problematic. This study assesses agreement within an international panel of lung pathologists and identifies factors contributing to inconsistent classification.

Methods and results: Sixty slides of small lung ACAs were reviewed digitally by six lung pathologists in three rounds, with consensus conferences and examination of elastic stains in round 3. The panel independently reviewed each case to assess final diagnosis, invasive component size and predominant pattern. The kappa value for AIS and MIA versus INV decreased from 0.44 (round 1) to 0.30 and 0.34 (rounds 2 and 3). Interobserver agreement for invasion (AIS versus other) decreased from 0.34 (round 1) to 0.29 and 0.29 (rounds 2 and 3). The range of the measured invasive component in a single case was up to 19.2 mm among observers. Agreement was excellent in tumours with high-grade cytology and fair with low-grade cytology.

Conclusions: Interobserver agreement in small lung ACAs was fair to moderate, and improved minimally with elastic stains. Poor agreement is primarily attributable to subjectivity in pattern recognition, but high-grade cytology increases agreement. More reliable methods to differentiate histological patterns may be necessary, including refinement of the definitions as well as recognition of other features (such as high-grade cytology) as a formal part of routine assessment.

Keywords: histological pattern; interobserver agreement; lung adenocarcinoma; minimally invasive adenocarcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jemal A, Ward EM, Johnson CJ et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2014, featuring survival. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2017; 109; djx030.
    1. Chen VW, Ruiz BA, Hsieh M et al. Analysis of stage and clinical/prognostic factors for lung cancer from SEER registries: AJCC staging and collaborative stage data collection system. Cancer. 2014; 120; 3781-3792.
    1. Ferrara R, Mezquita L, Besse B. Progress in the management of advanced thoracic malignancies in 2017. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2018; 13; 301-322.
    1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD et al. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N. Engl. J Med. 2011; 365; 395-409.
    1. Fintelmann FJ, Bernheim A, Digumarthy SR et al. The 10 pillars of lung cancer screening: rationale and logistics of a lung cancer screening program. Radiographics 2015; 35; 1893-1908.