Complications and Outcomes of Chimeric Free Flaps: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 31109239
- DOI: 10.1177/0194599819844997
Complications and Outcomes of Chimeric Free Flaps: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Objective: Ablations of locally advanced or recurrent head and neck cancer commonly result in large composite orofacial defects. Chimeric flaps represent a unique surgical option for these defects, as they provide diverse tissue types from a single donor site. The purpose of the study was to consolidate the literature on chimeric flaps with regard to postoperative complication rates to help inform surgical decision making.
Data sources: The librarian created search strategies with a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary in Ovid Medline (1946), Embase (1947), Scopus (1823), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrails.gov (1997).
Review methods: Candidate articles were independently reviewed by 2 authors familiar with the subject material, and inclusion/exclusion criteria were uniformly applied for article selection. Articles were considered eligible if they included patients who received a single chimeric flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects and if they provided data on complication rates.
Results: A total of 521 chimeric flaps were included in the study. The major complication rate was 22.6%, while the minor complication rate was 14.0%. There were 7 flap deaths noted in the series. Median operative time and harvest time were 15.0 and 2.5 hours, respectively.
Conclusion: Chimeric flaps represent a viable option for reconstruction of complex head and neck defects and have complication rates similar to those of double free flaps and single free flaps with locoregional flap while only modestly increasing total operative time.
Keywords: chimeric free flaps; composite defects; double free flap; head and neck reconstruction; systematic review.
Comment in
-
Letter to the Editor: Notes on Single Chimeric Flaps.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Apr;162(4):593. doi: 10.1177/0194599819898860. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020. PMID: 32267821 No abstract available.
-
Response to Notes on Single Chimeric Flaps.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Apr;162(4):594. doi: 10.1177/0194599819898863. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020. PMID: 32267822 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Complications of double free flap and free flap combined with locoregional flap in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review.Head Neck. 2018 Mar;40(3):632-646. doi: 10.1002/hed.25005. Epub 2017 Nov 15. Head Neck. 2018. PMID: 29140575
-
Management of Flap Failure After Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;167(2):224-235. doi: 10.1177/01945998211044683. Epub 2021 Sep 7. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022. PMID: 34491852 Free PMC article.
-
Complex Orofacial Reconstruction with the Intrinsic Chimeric Flap.J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017 May;33(4):233-243. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597656. Epub 2017 Jan 5. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017. PMID: 28056483
-
Chimeric Versus Multiple Simultaneous Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;171(6):1697-1704. doi: 10.1002/ohn.922. Epub 2024 Aug 8. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 39113633
-
Single Versus Simultaneous Double Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction: Comparison of Flap Outcomes and Donor-Site Morbidity.Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Feb;82(2):184-189. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001713. Ann Plast Surg. 2019. PMID: 30628942
Cited by
-
Health-Related Quality of Life in Oral Cancer Patients: Scoping Review and Critical Appraisal of Investigated Determinants.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 31;13(17):4398. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174398. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34503208 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical