Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 20;19(1):472.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5648-7.

A comprehensive approach to rehabilitation interventions following breast cancer treatment - a systematic review of systematic reviews

U Olsson Möller  1 , I Beck  1   2   3 , L Rydén  4 , M Malmström  2   5
Affiliations

A comprehensive approach to rehabilitation interventions following breast cancer treatment - a systematic review of systematic reviews

U Olsson Möller et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide. Post-treatment, patients suffer from side effects and have various rehabilitation needs, which means that individualization is fundamental for optimal rehabilitation. This systematic review (SR) of SRs aims to evaluate the current evidence on rehabilitation interventions in female patients following BC treatment.

Methods: Full-text SRs published in English from 2009 were searched in Embase, PubMed, Cinahl Complete, PsycINFO, AMED, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library.

Inclusion criteria: SRs of randomized or non-randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of rehabilitation interventions in women following BC treatment. All outcomes were considered. Methodological quality was evaluated using the AMSTAR 2 tool and interrater agreement was evaluated. Out of 1269 citations retrieved, 37 SRs were included.

Results: Five rehabilitation areas were identified: exercise and physical activity (PA), complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), yoga, lymphoedema treatment, and psychosocial interventions. The most solid evidence was found in exercise/PA and yoga. Exercise interventions improved outcomes such as shoulder mobility, lymphoedema, pain, fatigue and quality of life (QoL). Effects of yoga were shown on QoL, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms. The effect of CAM was shown on nausea, pain, fatigue, anger and anxiety but these results need to be interpreted with caution because of low methodological quality in included studies in the SRs. Among the lymphoedema treatments, positive effects were seen for resistance training on volume reduction and muscle strength and psychosocial interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy had positive effects on QoL, anxiety, depression and mood disturbance.

Conclusions: This SR of SRs show solid positive effects of exercise/PA and yoga for women following BC treatment, and provides extended knowledge of the effects of CAM, yoga, lymphoedema treatment and psychosocial interventions. It is evident that more than one intervention could have positive effects on a specific symptom and that the effects depend not only on intervention type but also on how and when the intervention is provided. The results can be used as a foundation for individualized rehabilitation and aid health care professionals in meeting patients' individual needs and preferences.

Trial registration: PROSPERO ( CRD42017060912 ).

Keywords: Breast cancer treatment; Breast neoplasm; Complementary therapies; Exercise; Lymphoedema; Psychosocial; Quality of life; Rehabilitation; Systematic review; Yoga.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart of the identification and inclusion of SRs
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer C FC. Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(4):505–527. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0735. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooney MA, Culleton-Quinn E, Stokes E. Current knowledge of pain after breast cancer treatment: a systematic review. Pain Manag Nurs. 2013;14(2):110–123. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2010.09.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. Jama. 2009;302(18):1985–1992. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1568. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain. 2011;12(7):725–746. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hayes SC, Janda M, Cornish B, Battistutta D, Newman B. Lymphedema after breast cancer: incidence, risk factors, and effect on upper body function. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3536–3542. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4899. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types