Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;6(7):e366-e374.
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30085-7. Epub 2019 May 17.

Prognostic risk score for patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with targeted therapies or chemoimmunotherapy: a retrospective, pooled cohort study with external validations

Affiliations

Prognostic risk score for patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with targeted therapies or chemoimmunotherapy: a retrospective, pooled cohort study with external validations

Jacob D Soumerai et al. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Jul.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Clinically validated prognostic models for overall survival do not exist for patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) who are on targeted therapies. We aimed to create a prognostic model to identify high-risk individuals who do not achieve a good outcome with available targeted therapies.

Methods: In this retrospective, pooled cohort study, 2475 patients with CLL treated between June 22, 2012, and Sept 23, 2015, in six randomised trials of ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax, or at the Mayo Clinic CLL Database (MCCD) were included. Eligible patients had CLL, were previously treated, were aged 18 years or older, had ECOG performance status 0-1, and required further treatment as per the international workshop on CLL 2008 criteria. There was heterogeneity in other eligibility criteria. We evaluated 28 candidate factors known to affect the overall survival of these patients and applied univariate and multivariate analyses to derive the risk score in a training dataset (n=727) of patients treated with ibrutinib or chemoimmunotherapy. We validated the score in an internal-validation dataset (n=242) of patients treated with ibrutinib or chemoimmunotherapy and three external-validation datasets (idelalisib or chemoimmunotherapy dataset, n=897; venetoclax or chemoimmunotherapy dataset, n=389; and the MCCD [including patients treated with heterogeneous therapies], n=220), applying C-statistics as a measure of discrimination.

Findings: The derived model consisted of four factors (one point each; serum β2-microglobulin ≥5 mg/dL, lactate dehydrogenase >upper limit of normal, haemoglobin <110 g/L for women or <120 g/L for men, and time from initiation of last therapy <24 months), separating patients into low (score 0-1), intermediate (score 2-3), and high risk (score 4) groups. The risk score was prognostic for overall survival in the training dataset (CS=0·74, 95% CI 0·60-0·85, log-rank p<0·0001), and in the internal-validation (CS=0·79, 0·56-0·97, log-rank p=0·0003), and all three external-validation cohorts (idelalisib or chemoimmunotherapy: CS=0·71, 0·59-0·81, log-rank p<0·0001; venetoclax or chemoimmunotherapy: CS =0·76, 0·66-0·85, log-rank p=0·014; MCCD cohort: CS=0·61, 0·56-0·66), log-rank p<0·0001). The risk score is available on Calculate by QxMD.

Interpretation: We present the first validated risk score to predict overall survival in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL treated with targeted therapy. The model is applicable to patients treated with all currently approved targeted therapies (ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax) and chemoimmunotherapy. This tool allows the identification of a well defined cohort of previously treated patients with CLL who are at high risk of death, and could be used in future prospective trials to test therapeutic options for these patients with an unmet clinical need.

Funding: Lymphoma Research Foundation, Lymphoma Research Fund (Andrew D Zelenetz), and National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Overall survival by risk group.
Overall survival (OS) by risk group in the ibrutinib phase 3 trials training dataset (A), ibrutinib phase 3 trials internal-validation dataset (B), idelalisib phase 3 trials external-validation dataset (C), venetoclax phase 3 trial external-validation dataset (D), and Mayo Clinic CLL Database external-validation dataset (E).
Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Overall survival by risk group.
Overall survival (OS) by risk group in the ibrutinib phase 3 trials training dataset (A), ibrutinib phase 3 trials internal-validation dataset (B), idelalisib phase 3 trials external-validation dataset (C), venetoclax phase 3 trial external-validation dataset (D), and Mayo Clinic CLL Database external-validation dataset (E).
Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Overall survival by risk group.
Overall survival (OS) by risk group in the ibrutinib phase 3 trials training dataset (A), ibrutinib phase 3 trials internal-validation dataset (B), idelalisib phase 3 trials external-validation dataset (C), venetoclax phase 3 trial external-validation dataset (D), and Mayo Clinic CLL Database external-validation dataset (E).
Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Overall survival by risk group.
Overall survival (OS) by risk group in the ibrutinib phase 3 trials training dataset (A), ibrutinib phase 3 trials internal-validation dataset (B), idelalisib phase 3 trials external-validation dataset (C), venetoclax phase 3 trial external-validation dataset (D), and Mayo Clinic CLL Database external-validation dataset (E).
Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Overall survival by risk group.
Overall survival (OS) by risk group in the ibrutinib phase 3 trials training dataset (A), ibrutinib phase 3 trials internal-validation dataset (B), idelalisib phase 3 trials external-validation dataset (C), venetoclax phase 3 trial external-validation dataset (D), and Mayo Clinic CLL Database external-validation dataset (E).

Comment in

References

    1. Rai KR, Sawitsky A, Cronkite E, Chanana A, Levy R, Pasternack B. Clinical staging of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. Blood 1975; 46: 219–34. - PubMed
    1. Binet JL, Auquier A, Dighiero G, et al. A new prognostic classification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia derived from a multivariate survival analysis. Cancer 1981; 48: 198–206. - PubMed
    1. Hamblin TJ, Davis Z, Gardiner A, Oscier DG, Stevenson FK. Unmutated Ig VH Genes Are Associated With a More Aggressive Form of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Blood 1999; 94 http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/94/6/1848.short (accessed March 29, 2017). - PubMed
    1. Stilgenbauer S, Schnaiter A, Paschka P, et al. Gene mutations and treatment outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the CLL8 trial. Blood 2014; 123: 3247–54. - PubMed
    1. Döhner H, Stilgenbauer S, Benner A, et al. Genomic aberrations and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1910–6. - PubMed

MeSH terms