Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 17;44(6):365-369.
doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjz025.

Long-Term Test-Retest Reliability of the UPSIT in Cognitively Intact Older Adults

Davangere P Devanand  1   2 , Xinhua Liu  3 , Hannah Cohen  1 , John Budrow  1   4 , Nicole Schupf  5 , Jennifer Manly  5 , Seonjoo Lee  2   3   6
Affiliations

Long-Term Test-Retest Reliability of the UPSIT in Cognitively Intact Older Adults

Davangere P Devanand et al. Chem Senses. .

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the long-term test-retest reliability of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), and its individual items, in cognitively intact older adults. A community sample of older adults received a neuropsychological test battery, including the 12-item, 6-trial Selective Reminding Test (SRT). The UPSIT was administered at baseline and follow-up that occurred between 1 and 4 years after baseline. UPSIT scores of participants who were cognitively intact and did not decline cognitively were examined for test-retest reliability. In 92 older adults with mean age 77.6 years followed for 2.79 (standard deviation [SD] 0.69) years, mean UPSIT score declined from 30.29 (SD 5.83) to 27.80 (SD 5.50). In linear mixed models that adjusted for time, age, sex, and education, intraclass correlation coefficients for UPSIT were 0.65, SRT delayed recall 0.59, and SRT total immediate recall 0.49. Among 4 possible response combinations, the largest proportion of participants had correct responses at both visits for 35 out of 40 items. Consistency of item responses ranged from 50% to 90% across the 2 time points. The long-term test-retest reliability of the UPSIT was moderately strong without practice effects over long periods of time in older adults. These results provide indirect support to prior findings on odor identification impairment predicting cognitive decline and dementia, and suggest potential use of olfactory testing as a biomarker in prevention and treatment trials of cognitive enhancers.

Keywords: aging; item analysis; odor identification; olfaction; reliability; test–retest.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Buschke H. 1973. Selective reminding for analysis of memory and learning. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 12(5):543–550.
    1. Devanand DP, Lee S, Manly J, Andrews H, Schupf N, Doty RL, Stern Y, Zahodne LB, Louis ED, Mayeux R. 2015. Olfactory deficits predict cognitive decline and Alzheimer dementia in an urban community. Neurology. 84(2):182–189. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Devanand DP, Liu X, Tabert MH, Pradhaban G, Cuasay K, Bell K, de Leon MJ, Doty RL, Stern Y, Pelton GH. 2008. Combining early markers strongly predicts conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. Biol Psychiatry. 64:871–879. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Devanand DP, Tabert MH, Cuasay K, Manly JJ, Schupf N, Brickman AM, Andrews H, Brown TR, DeCarli C, Mayeux R. 2010. Olfactory identification deficits and MCI in a multi-ethnic elderly community sample. Neurobiol Aging. 31:1593–1600. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doty RL. 2017. Olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases: is there a common pathological substrate? Lancet Neurol. 16:478–488. - PubMed

Publication types