Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2019 May;46(3):187-188.
doi: 10.5999/aps.2019.00528. Epub 2019 May 15.

The peer review system of Archives of Plastic Surgery: Current status and plans for improvement

Kyu Jin Chung  1
Affiliations
Editorial

The peer review system of Archives of Plastic Surgery: Current status and plans for improvement

Kyu Jin Chung. Arch Plast Surg. 2019 May.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

    1. Smith R. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. J R Soc Med. 2006;99:178–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferguson C, Marcus A, Oransky I. Publishing: the peer-review scam. Nature. 2017;515:480–2. - PubMed
    1. Qi X, Deng H, Guo X. Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview. Postgrad Med J. 2017;93:499–503. - PubMed
    1. Benos DJ, Kirk KL, Hall JE. How to review a paper. Adv Physiol Educ. 2003;27:47–52. - PubMed
    1. Dadkhah M, Kahani M, Borchardt G. A method for improving the integrity of peer review. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24:1603–10. - PubMed

Publication types