Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Sep;13(9):2143-2149.
doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0444-6. Epub 2019 May 21.

Associational effects in the microbial neighborhood

Affiliations
Review

Associational effects in the microbial neighborhood

Anja Worrich et al. ISME J. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Even though "perfect" metagenomes or metatranscriptomes are close at hand, the implicit assumption of spatial homogeneity in the "omic" approaches makes it difficult if not impossible to relate those data to ecological processes occurring in natural and man-made ecosystems. In fact, the distribution of microbes in their habitats is far from being uniform and random. Microbial communities show a high degree of spatial organization that stems from environmental gradients and local interactions. These interactions can be very complex and may involve multiple species. Several studies highlighted the importance of indirect interactions for community stability, but the absence of a theoretical framework for microbial ecology restricts the possibilities to strike a balance between the investigation of simple communities with purely pairwise interactions and the attempts to understand interaction patterns in whole communities based on meta-omics studies. Here we suggest adapting the concept of Associational Effects (AE) from plant ecology, to better understand the link between ecological interactions, spatial arrangement, and stability in microbial communities. By bringing together a conceptual framework developed for plants and observations made for microbes, this perspective article fosters synthesis of related disciplines to yield novel insights into the advancing field of spatial microbial ecology. To promote the integration into microbial ecology, we (i) outline the theoretical background of AE, (ii) collect underlying mechanisms by literature synthesis, (iii) propose a three-point roadmap for the investigation of AE in microbial communities, and (iv) discuss its implications for microbial ecology research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Transfer of the AE framework from plant to microbial ecology. The framework describes the modulation of the interaction between a plant and a herbivore by a neighboring plant species. The modulation depends on the spatial organization and can either decrease (Associational Resistance, AR) or increase (Associational Susceptibility, AS) the damage/mortality of the focal species. In microbial ecology, this concept will help to bundle research activities on indirect interactions in spatially structured microbial communities
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Physical, chemical, and biological mechanisms causing AE in bacterial communities. Physical mechanisms mainly prevent the accessibility or ingestion of the focal species (F) by forming larger or more complex structures together with the modulating species (M). Chemical mechanisms lead to repellence or attraction of predators via the production and release of secondary metabolites by M, whereas the detoxification of chemicals by M decreases the susceptibility of F. Biological mechanisms are diverse and include changes in the abundance or traits of F, or the attraction of natural enemies by M
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Conceptual, experimental, and methodological demands to study AE in microbial communities. Although direct pairwise interactions were intensively studied, the importance of indirect interactions in microbial ecology remains elusive. To move beyond communities with simple pairwise interactions, it requires (i) a rethinking of existing theories and concepts, (ii) tailored experimental systems to study microbial interactions in spatially structured assemblies and habitats, and (iii) new modeling approaches considering higher-order interactions in spatially explicit modeling environments

References

    1. Lowery NV, Ursell T. Structured environments fundamentally alter dynamics and stability of ecological communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:379–88. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boedicker JQ, Brenner K, Weibel DB. Spatial structure of microbes in nature and the biophysics of cell–cell communication. In: The physical basis of bacterial quorum communication. Springer, 2015; pp 53–81.
    1. Watrous JD, Dorrestein PC. Imaging mass spectrometry in microbiology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9:683. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2634. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levine JM, Bascompte J, Adler PB, Allesina S. Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities. Nature. 2017;546:56. doi: 10.1038/nature22898. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbosa P, Hines J, Kaplan I, Martinson H, Szczepaniec A, Szendrei Z. Associational resistance and associational susceptibility: having right or wrong neighbors. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 2009;40:1–20. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120242. - DOI

Publication types