Validation study of the Parkinson's Fatigue Scale in advanced Parkinson's disease
- PMID: 31114412
- PMCID: PMC6497829
- DOI: 10.2147/PROM.S196042
Validation study of the Parkinson's Fatigue Scale in advanced Parkinson's disease
Abstract
Purpose: To validate the Parkinson's Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) in advanced Parkinson Disease (APD) patients using the scale's Spanish version. Patients and methods: In a clinical study for Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG), 59 patients were assessed over six months using the PFS-16 and other instruments. The psychometric properties of the PFS-16 were then analyzed. Results: Patients (60.7% men) were aged 68.02±7.43 years. PD duration was 12.57±5.97 years. Median Hoehn and Yahr (HY) stage of patients in "on" was 2 (range: 1-4). There were excellent data quality and acceptability for the PFS-16 as a whole, except for moderate-to-high ceiling effects in its items. Two factors explained 67% of the variance, yet parallel analysis demonstrated the unidimensional nature of the PFS-16, whose internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha=0.93; item homogeneity coefficient=0.19, and item total-corrected correlations=0.50-0.84). PFS-16 total score showed moderate-to-high correlations with fatigue-specific questions within clinical tools, namely item 20 of the Beck Depression Inventory (rS=0.65) and item 4 of the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (rS=0.33). Weak-to-moderate correlations were observed between the PFS-16 and measures of anxiety, depression, apathy, and quality of life. There were no significant differences in PFS-16 total scores when grouped by age, sex, time from diagnosis, HY, and CGI-S. After treatment with LCIG, the relative change in PFS-16 total score was -17.6% and the effect size (Cohen's d) was 0.92. Moderate correlations between changes in the PFS-16 and several other clinical tools were also found. Conclusion: In APD patients, the PFS-16 showed satisfactory acceptability, internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness.
Keywords: PFS-16; Parkinson’s Fatigue Scale; Parkinson’s disease; advanced Parkinson’s disease; fatigue; psychometric properties.
Conflict of interest statement
P. Martinez-Martin received honoraria from Editorial Viguera for lecturing in courses; International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society for management of the Program on Rating Scales; Air Liquide, HM Hospitales de Madrid, and Zambon for advice in clinic epidemiological studies; license fee payments for the King’s Parkinson’s Disease Pain scale; and grant from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society to attend the congress of the society in 2017. J.M. Arbelo González has received honoraria from AbbVie, Zambon, Bial, and Teva. M. J. Catalán has received honoraria for speaking services and research from AbbVie Laboratories and Merz. F. Valldeoriola has received honoraria for speaking services and advisory boards from AbbVie, Zambon, Teva, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources