Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul;25(4):545-557.
doi: 10.1111/hae.13769. Epub 2019 May 21.

How to discuss gene therapy for haemophilia? A patient and physician perspective

Affiliations
Review

How to discuss gene therapy for haemophilia? A patient and physician perspective

Wolfgang Miesbach et al. Haemophilia. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Gene therapy has the potential to revolutionise treatment for patients with haemophilia and is close to entering clinical practice. While factor concentrates have improved outcomes, individuals still face a lifetime of injections, pain, progressive joint damage, the potential for inhibitor development and impaired quality of life. Recently published studies in adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector-mediated gene therapy have demonstrated improvement in endogenous factor levels over sustained periods, significant reduction in annualised bleed rates, lower exogenous factor usage and thus far a positive safety profile. In making the shared decision to proceed with gene therapy for haemophilia, physicians should make it clear that research is ongoing and that there are remaining evidence gaps, such as long-term safety profiles and duration of treatment effect. The eligibility criteria for gene therapy trials mean that key patient groups may be excluded, eg children/adolescents, those with liver or kidney dysfunction and those with a prior history of factor inhibitors or pre-existing neutralising AAV antibodies. Gene therapy offers a life-changing opportunity for patients to reduce their bleeding risk while also reducing or abrogating the need for exogenous factor administration. Given the expanding evidence base, both physicians and patients will need sources of clear and reliable information to be able to discuss and judge the risks and benefits of treatment.

Keywords: Adeno-associated virus; factor IX; factor VIII; gene therapy; haemophilia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

W. Miesbach has received consultant fees from uniQure BV, grants and personal fees from Novo‐Nordisk and personal fees from Bayer, Shire, Biotest, Pfizer, Octapharma, LFB, CSL Behring, SOBI, Biogen, and BPL. B. O'Mahony declares no conflict of interest. N.S. Key has acted in the capacity of a consultant for uniQure BV and Spark Therapeutics. BV. M. Makris has participated in advisory groups for Freeline Therapeutics and Spark Therapeutics.

References

    1. O'Hara J, Hughes D, Camp C, Burke T, Carroll L, Diego DG. The cost of severe haemophilia in Europe: the CHESS study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saito H, Matsushita T, Kojima T. Historical perspective and future direction of coagulation research. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9(Suppl 1):352‐363. - PubMed
    1. Srivastava A, Brewer AK, Mauser‐Bunschoten EP, et al. Guidelines for the management of hemophilia. Haemophilia. 2013;19(1):e1‐47. - PubMed
    1. Makris M, Hermans C. A golden age for Haemophilia treatment? Haemophilia. 2018;24(2):175‐176. - PubMed
    1. Schwartz CE, Powell VE, Su J, Zhang J, Eldar‐Lissai A. The impact of extended half‐life versus conventional factor product on hemophilia caregiver burden. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1335‐1345. - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding