How to discuss gene therapy for haemophilia? A patient and physician perspective
- PMID: 31115117
- PMCID: PMC6852207
- DOI: 10.1111/hae.13769
How to discuss gene therapy for haemophilia? A patient and physician perspective
Abstract
Gene therapy has the potential to revolutionise treatment for patients with haemophilia and is close to entering clinical practice. While factor concentrates have improved outcomes, individuals still face a lifetime of injections, pain, progressive joint damage, the potential for inhibitor development and impaired quality of life. Recently published studies in adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector-mediated gene therapy have demonstrated improvement in endogenous factor levels over sustained periods, significant reduction in annualised bleed rates, lower exogenous factor usage and thus far a positive safety profile. In making the shared decision to proceed with gene therapy for haemophilia, physicians should make it clear that research is ongoing and that there are remaining evidence gaps, such as long-term safety profiles and duration of treatment effect. The eligibility criteria for gene therapy trials mean that key patient groups may be excluded, eg children/adolescents, those with liver or kidney dysfunction and those with a prior history of factor inhibitors or pre-existing neutralising AAV antibodies. Gene therapy offers a life-changing opportunity for patients to reduce their bleeding risk while also reducing or abrogating the need for exogenous factor administration. Given the expanding evidence base, both physicians and patients will need sources of clear and reliable information to be able to discuss and judge the risks and benefits of treatment.
Keywords: Adeno-associated virus; factor IX; factor VIII; gene therapy; haemophilia.
© 2019 The Authors. Haemophilia Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
W. Miesbach has received consultant fees from uniQure BV, grants and personal fees from Novo‐Nordisk and personal fees from Bayer, Shire, Biotest, Pfizer, Octapharma, LFB, CSL Behring, SOBI, Biogen, and BPL. B. O'Mahony declares no conflict of interest. N.S. Key has acted in the capacity of a consultant for uniQure BV and Spark Therapeutics. BV. M. Makris has participated in advisory groups for Freeline Therapeutics and Spark Therapeutics.
References
-
- Saito H, Matsushita T, Kojima T. Historical perspective and future direction of coagulation research. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9(Suppl 1):352‐363. - PubMed
-
- Srivastava A, Brewer AK, Mauser‐Bunschoten EP, et al. Guidelines for the management of hemophilia. Haemophilia. 2013;19(1):e1‐47. - PubMed
-
- Makris M, Hermans C. A golden age for Haemophilia treatment? Haemophilia. 2018;24(2):175‐176. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical