Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 8;137(1):13-24.
doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0292071218.

Secondhand smoking, knowledge/attitudes and socioeconomic status among married Bangladeshi women: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Secondhand smoking, knowledge/attitudes and socioeconomic status among married Bangladeshi women: a cross-sectional study

Mosiur Rahman et al. Sao Paulo Med J. .

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of research on knowledge/attitudes regarding the dangers of exposure to secondhand smoking (SHS) among women. The relationship between exposure to SHS, socioeconomic status (SES) and knowledge/attitudes regarding the risks of SHS has often been ignored. We therefore aimed to examine (1) whether SES and exposure to SHS were independently associated with knowledge/attitudes regarding the risks of SHS; and (2) whether women with low SES and exposure to SHS were uniquely disadvantaged in terms of deficient knowledge and more dismissive attitudes towards the risks of SHS.

Design and setting: Cross-sectional study in the Rajshahi district, Bangladesh.

Methods: A total of 541 women were interviewed. Knowledge of and attitudes towards the risks of SHS were the outcomes of interest.

Results: A majority of the respondents were exposed to SHS at home (49.0%). Only 20.1% had higher levels of knowledge, and only 37.3% had non-dismissive attitudes towards the risks of SHS. Participants in the low SES group and those exposed to SHS had lower odds of higher knowledge and their attitudes towards the risks of SHS were more dismissive. Regarding deficient levels of knowledge and scores indicating more dismissive attitudes, women in the low SES group and who were exposed to SHS were not uniquely disadvantaged.

Conclusions: Exposure to SHS and low SES were independently associated with deficient knowledge and scores indicating more dismissive attitudes. Regarding knowledge/attitudes, the negative effect of exposure to SHS extended across all socioeconomic backgrounds and was not limited to women in either the low or the high SES group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Distribution of knowledge grading according to exposure or non-exposure to secondhand smoking, after stratification according to socioeconomic status.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Distribution of attitude grading according to exposure or non-exposure to secondhand smoking, after stratification according to socioeconomic status.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kumar S, Preetha G. Health promotion: an effective tool for global health. Indian J Community Med. 2012;37(1):5–12. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.94009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Smoking and tobacco use: fact sheet, second hand smoke. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/secondhand_smoke/ Accessed in 2018 (July 18)
    1. Wang Z, May SM, Charoenlap S, et al. Effects of secondhand smoke exposure on asthma morbidity and health care utilization in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;115(5):396–401.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.08.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim JH, Choi JY, Kim NY, et al. Clinical risk factors associated with the development of wheezing in children less than 2 years of age who required hospitalization for viral lower respiratory tract infections. Korean J Pediatr. 2015;58(7):245–250. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2015.58.7.245. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Betts KS. Secondhand suspicions: breast cancer and passive smoking. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2007;115(3):A136–A143. doi: 10.1289/ehp.115-a136. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances