Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 22;17(1):172.
doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1922-3.

Biobanking in health care: evolution and future directions

Affiliations
Review

Biobanking in health care: evolution and future directions

Luigi Coppola et al. J Transl Med. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present review is to discuss how the promising field of biobanking can support health care research strategies. As the concept has evolved over time, biobanks have grown from simple biological sample repositories to complex and dynamic units belonging to large infrastructure networks, such as the Pan-European Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI). Biobanks were established to support scientific knowledge. Different professional figures with varied expertise collaborate to obtain and collect biological and clinical data from human subjects. At same time biobanks preserve the human and legal rights of each person that offers biomaterial for research.

Methods: A literature review was conducted in April 2019 from the online database PubMed, accessed through the Bibliosan platform. Four primary topics related to biobanking will be discussed: (i) evolution, (ii) bioethical issues, (iii) organization, and (iv) imaging.

Results: Most biobanks were founded as local units to support specific research projects, so they evolved in a decentralized manner. The consequence is an urgent needing for procedure harmonization regarding sample collection, processing, and storage. Considering the involvement of biomaterials obtained from human beings, different ethical issues such as the informed consent model, sample ownership, veto rights, and biobank sustainability are debated. In the face of these methodological and ethical challenges, international organizations such as BBMRI play a key role in supporting biobanking activities. Finally, a unique development is the creation of imaging biobanks that support the translation of imaging biomarkers (identified using a radiomic approach) into clinical practice by ensuring standardization of data acquisition and analysis, accredited technical validation, and transparent sharing of biological and clinical data.

Conclusion: Modern biobanks permit large-scale analysis for individuation of specific diseases biomarkers starting from biological or digital material (i.e., bioimages) with well-annotated clinical and biological data. These features are essential for improving personalized medical approaches, where effective biomarker identification is a critical step for disease diagnosis and prognosis.

Keywords: Biobank; Biobanking; Bioethics; Human samples; Imaging biobank; Personalized medicine; Radiogenomics; Radiomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Graphical representation of the number of publications related to biobanking obtained from PubMed. a Shows the number of publications over time. b Shows the number of publications classified for: Cancer, Consent, Ethics, Biomarkers, Genomics, Public health, Personalized medicine and Pharmacogenomics (April 8, 2019)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Hypothetical workflow model for collection, storage and distribution of samples in biobanking. a displays an example of automation of biological sample aliquoting. b shows a storage unit where biosamples can be stored in mechanical freezers or liquid nitrogen storage device. c displays the phases needed for samples sharing. A management software is needed for samples retrieval and an approved material transfer agreement (MTA) in case of both internal and external users before samples transferring
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A schematic description of radiogenomic approach. The integration of molecular and imaging data is needed for a radiogenomic approach to the patient in a personalized medicine setting

References

    1. Loft S, Poulsen HE. Cancer risk and oxidative DNA damage in man. J Mol Med (Berlin, Germany) 1996;74:297–312. - PubMed
    1. Carey DJ, Fetterolf SN, Davis D, Faucett WA, Kirchner HL, Mirshahi U, Murray MF, Smelser DT, Gerhard GS, Ledbetter DH. The Geisinger MyCode community health initiative: an electronic health record-linked biobank for precision medicine research. Genet Med. 2016;18:906–913. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu AG, Pollard K. Biobanking for personalized medicine. In: KarimiBusheri F, editor. Biobanking in the 21st century. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Berlin: Springer; 2015. pp. 55–68. - PubMed
    1. Hewitt R, Watson P. Defining Biobank. Biopreserv Biobank. 2013;11:309–315. - PubMed
    1. Zika E, Paci D, Braun A, Rijkers-Defrasne S, Deschenes M, Fortier I, Laage-Hellman J, Scerri CA, Ibarreta D. A European survey on biobanks: trends and issues. Public Health Genomics. 2011;14:96–103. - PubMed

Publication types