Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Aug;42(4):256-263.
doi: 10.1002/nur.21952. Epub 2019 May 22.

Closer: A videoconference intervention for distance caregivers of cancer patients

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Closer: A videoconference intervention for distance caregivers of cancer patients

Eric Blackstone et al. Res Nurs Health. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Distance caregivers (DCGs) represent a growing demographic. The emotional burden of caregiving for a family member with cancer is amplified by the logistical challenges of providing support from afar. DCGs feel higher levels of distress, anxiety, and depression compared with local caregivers. Videoconference technology may alleviate both the emotional and practical burdens faced by DCGs. This is an ongoing randomized controlled trial in 32 outpatient ambulatory clinics at a large, urban, comprehensive cancer center. To date, 332 patient-DCG dyads have been enrolled. DCGs must have internet access and have been identified by the patient as a source of support. The intervention period is 4 months. DCGs are randomized to one of three arms: DCGs in Arm 1 receive four coaching sessions with an advanced practice nurse or social worker and four videoconference appointments during the oncologist-patient office visit. DCGs in Arm 2 participate in four videoconference appointments with the oncologist and patient, and Arm 3 is the control group, which receives access to information through a website. Primary outcome variables are DCG distress, anxiety, depression, burden, self-efficacy, and emotional support. These data are collected electronically at baseline, 4 months, and 6 months. Patient distress, anxiety, and depression are also assessed at these same intervals using brief in-person interviews. The change in each of the DCG outcomes over time will be examined by a repeated measures analysis of covariance.

Keywords: cancer; distance caregiving; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Badr H, Carmack CL, & Diefenbach MA (2015). Psychosocial interventions for patients and caregivers in the age of new communication technologies: Opportunities and challenges in cancer care. Journal of Health Communication, 1–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baldock CV (2000). Migrants and their parents: Caregiving from a distance. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 205–224
    1. Benefield LE & Beck C (2007). Reducing the distance in distance-caregiving by technology innovation. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 2, 267–72 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bevan JL & Sparks L (2011). Communication in the context of long-distance family caregiving: An integrated review and practical applications. Patient Education & Counseling, 85, 26–30 - PubMed
    1. Bland J (1988). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 8, 307–310 - PubMed

Publication types