Appendix or Ileum-Which is the Best Material for Mitrofanoff Channel Formation in Adults?

Abstract

Purpose: We report long-term data on a large cohort of adults who underwent formation of a continent catheterizable channel for various indications. We examined outcomes according to the tissue used for channel formation.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the case notes of 176 consecutive adult patients in whom a continent catheterizable channel was created using the Mitrofanoff principle for a broad range of indications a median of 142 months (range 54 to 386) previously. We evaluated outcomes in terms of continued use and continence for each type of material used for channel formation.

Results: At the time of this review 165 of the 173 patients (95.4%) included in this study were alive. We included 114 women (65.9%) and 59 men (34.1%) who underwent surgery at a median age of 42 years (range 18 to 73) with a mean followup of 78.6 months (median 60, range 2 to 365). The rate of revision for all causes was higher in the ileal group than in the group with an appendiceal channel (channel stenosis rate 22.7% vs 17.2%, p = 0.39, and channel incontinence rate 36.0% vs 19.5%, p = 0.03). Although 38.7% of patients underwent major surgical revision of the channel at some point, 75.9% of channels continued to be used, of which 90.2% were continent.

Conclusions: This study provides a pragmatic overview of the outcome of these challenging cases. Mitrofanoff channel formation represents a durable technique. Appendix and ileum are each a viable choice for tissue use. Tissue selection depends on availability and individual patient factors.

Keywords: appendix; ileum; urinary bladder; urinary diversion; urinary incontinence.