The role of routine nasolacrimal sac biopsy during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy
- PMID: 31120602
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.28070
The role of routine nasolacrimal sac biopsy during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy
Abstract
Objectives/hypothesis: Most patients who undergo endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) have a diagnosis of idiopathic nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of routine biopsy of the lacrimal sac performed at time of DCR on subsequent patient diagnosis and treatment.
Study design: Retrospective review.
Methods: The histopathology of nasolacrimal specimens (n = 769), obtained from 654 consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic DCR by a single surgeon over a 30-year period, were reviewed. Specific focus included the identification of unanticipated pathologic findings as they related to pertinent patient demographics, clinical presentation, radiologic findings, and intraoperative observations.
Results: The study population was 69.6% female, with an average age of 56.1 ± 18.2 years. Pathological findings of tissue from the nasolacrimal sac, which was routinely sampled in all cases, showed inflammation (n = 566 [73.6%]), normal histology (n = 147 [19.1%]), granulomas (n = 8 [1.0%]), and neoplastic process (n = 7 [0.9%]). Patient history, preoperative CT scan, and/or intraoperative findings alerted the surgeon to the possibility of an unusual diagnosis in 12 of the 15 patients. An unsuspected neoplastic or granulomatous cause of lacrimal obstruction was identified on intraoperative biopsy in three patients (0.46%).
Conclusions: Although neoplastic and granulomatous diseases are relatively rare causes of lacrimal obstruction necessitating DCR surgery, they may be identified by through patient evaluation in most cases and by routine intraoperative biopsy of the lacrimal sac in all cases.
Level of evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:584-589, 2020.
Keywords: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy; dacryocystorhinostomy; lacrimal sac neoplasm; lacrimal sac sarcoidosis.
© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Clinicopathologic findings from lacrimal sac biopsy specimens obtained during dacryocystorhinostomy.Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 May;19(3):173-6. doi: 10.1097/01.iop.0000066646.59045.5a. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003. PMID: 12918549
-
Clinically suspected primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: clinicopathologic review of 150 patients.Ophthalmology. 1997 Nov;104(11):1882-6. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30012-8. Ophthalmology. 1997. PMID: 9373121 Review.
-
Effectiveness of indocyanine green gel in the identification and complete removal of the medial wall of the lacrimal sac during endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;52(5):494-498. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 May 16. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28985810
-
Usefulness of the dacryoscintigraphy in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction prior to endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul;257(7):1535-1540. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04303-4. Epub 2019 Apr 29. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31037489
-
Clinical significance of routine lacrimal sac biopsy during dacryocystorhinostomy: A comprehensive review of literature.Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2017 Feb 21;17(1):1-8. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2016.1424. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 27754826 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Dacryoendoscopy as a frontier technology for lacrimal drainage disorders.Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2025 Sep;69(5):661-672. doi: 10.1007/s10384-025-01255-7. Epub 2025 Aug 7. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40773001 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The predictive value of nasolacrimal sac biopsy in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Apr 16;65:102317. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102317. eCollection 2021 May. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021. PMID: 33981427 Free PMC article.
-
Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma of the Lacrimal Sac and Literature Review of the Lacrimal System.Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2020 Apr 20;11:2152656720920600. doi: 10.1177/2152656720920600. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2020. PMID: 32341837 Free PMC article.
-
Isolated noncaseating granulomatous inflammation of the lacrimal sac masquerading as a malignancy.Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 18;35(3):269-272. doi: 10.4103/SJOPT.SJOPT_15_21. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35601858 Free PMC article.
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
-
- Linberg JV, McCormick SA. Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a clinicopathologic report and biopsy technique. Ophthalmology 1986;93:1055-1063.
-
- Tucker N, Chow D, Stockl F, Codère F, Burnier M. Clinically suspected primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: clinicopathologic review of 150 patients. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1882-1886.
-
- Anderson NG, Wojno TH, Grossniklaus HE. Clinicopathologic findings from lacrimal sac biopsy specimens obtained during dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;19:173-176.
-
- Marthin JK, Lindegaard J, Prause JU, Heegaard S. Lesions of the lacrimal drainage system: a clinicopathological study of 643 biopsy specimens of the lacrimal drainage system in Denmark 1910-1999. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005;83:94-99.
-
- Knežević M, Stojković M, Jovanović M, Stanković Z, Rašić DM. A 7-year prospective study of routine histopathological evaluation of the lacrimal sac wall incisional biopsy specimens obtained during external dacryocystorhinostomy in adults and a review of the literature. Med Oncol 2012;29:396-400.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials