Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;14(9):1583-1593.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 20.

Spread Through Air Spaces (STAS) Is Prognostic in Atypical Carcinoid, Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma, and Small Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

Affiliations

Spread Through Air Spaces (STAS) Is Prognostic in Atypical Carcinoid, Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma, and Small Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

Rania G Aly et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) has prognostic significance in lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. We sought to investigate the prognostic importance of STAS in lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

Methods: All tumor slides from patients with resected pathologic stage I to III lung NETs (N = 487) (299 with typical carcinoid [TC], 38 with atypical carcinoid [AC], 93 with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma [LCNEC], and 57 with SCLC) treated between 1992 and 2012 were evaluated for presence of STAS. Cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) and lung cancer-specific cumulative incidence of death (LC-CID) were analyzed by using a competing-risks approach.

Results: STAS was identified in 26% of NETs (16% of TCs, 37% of ACs, 43% of LCNECs, and 46% of SCLCs). STAS was associated with distant metastasis, as well as with higher CIR and LC-CID in the overall cohort and in the AC, LCNEC, and SCLC cohorts (owing to a small number of recurrences and deaths [<5], prognostic analysis was not performed in the TC cohort). In multivariable analysis stratified by stage, STAS was significantly associated with higher CIR (subhazard ratio = 2.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.73-4.68, p < 0.001) and LC-CID (subhazard ratio = 2.72, 95% confidence interval: 1.57-4.70, p < 0.001), independent of histologic subtype. STAS was independently associated with CIR and LC-CID in the LCNEC cohort and LC-CID in the SCLC cohort.

Conclusions: In patients with lung NETs, STAS is associated with early distant metastasis and worse LC-CID. In patients with LCNEC or SCLC, STAS is an independent poor prognostic factor.

Keywords: Competing-risks analysis; Lung cancer–specific death; Lung neuroendocrine tumor; Recurrence; Spread through air spaces.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Artifacts: A) More than four air spaces away from the tumor edge are clusters of tumor cells with ragged edges. These tumor clusters are isolated distantly away from the tumor edge lacking spread in air spaces continuously from the tumor edge. B) Higher power shows this tumor cluster has jagged edges suggesting an artifact from a knife cut. C) These tumor cells are situated on the edge of the tissue and were located far away from the border of the tumor. D) Along the edge of the tumor clusters is a sharp flat edge that indicates a knife cut and the tumor cells appear compressed against the tissue rather than being contained within the tissue.
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Artifacts: A) More than four air spaces away from the tumor edge are clusters of tumor cells with ragged edges. These tumor clusters are isolated distantly away from the tumor edge lacking spread in air spaces continuously from the tumor edge. B) Higher power shows this tumor cluster has jagged edges suggesting an artifact from a knife cut. C) These tumor cells are situated on the edge of the tissue and were located far away from the border of the tumor. D) Along the edge of the tumor clusters is a sharp flat edge that indicates a knife cut and the tumor cells appear compressed against the tissue rather than being contained within the tissue.
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Artifacts: A) More than four air spaces away from the tumor edge are clusters of tumor cells with ragged edges. These tumor clusters are isolated distantly away from the tumor edge lacking spread in air spaces continuously from the tumor edge. B) Higher power shows this tumor cluster has jagged edges suggesting an artifact from a knife cut. C) These tumor cells are situated on the edge of the tissue and were located far away from the border of the tumor. D) Along the edge of the tumor clusters is a sharp flat edge that indicates a knife cut and the tumor cells appear compressed against the tissue rather than being contained within the tissue.
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Artifacts: A) More than four air spaces away from the tumor edge are clusters of tumor cells with ragged edges. These tumor clusters are isolated distantly away from the tumor edge lacking spread in air spaces continuously from the tumor edge. B) Higher power shows this tumor cluster has jagged edges suggesting an artifact from a knife cut. C) These tumor cells are situated on the edge of the tissue and were located far away from the border of the tumor. D) Along the edge of the tumor clusters is a sharp flat edge that indicates a knife cut and the tumor cells appear compressed against the tissue rather than being contained within the tissue.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Representative images of spread through air spaces (STAS) (red circles) in atypical carcinoid (A), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (B), and small cell lung carcinoma (C). STAS is identified as solid nests in the air spaces in the lung parenchyma beyond the edge of the main tumor (black line) (original magnification, x100)
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) and lung cancer–specific cumulative incidence of death (LC-CID) curves for patients with and without spread through air spaces (STAS) in the overall cohort (A and E) and the atypical carcinoid (AC; B and F), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC; C and G), and small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC; D and H) cohorts.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. JClinOncol 2008;26:3063–72. - PubMed
    1. Travis WD. Advances in neuroendocrine lung tumors. AnnOncol 2010;21 Suppl 7:vii65-vii71. - PubMed
    1. Skuladottir H, Hirsch FR, Hansen HH, Olsen JH. Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors: incidence and prognosis of histological subtypes. A population-based study in Denmark. Lung Cancer 2002;37:127–35. - PubMed
    1. Gustafsson BI, Kidd M, Chan A, Malfertheiner MV, Modlin IM. Bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer 2008;113:5–21. - PubMed
    1. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Burke AP, Marx A, Nicholson AG. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2015. - PubMed

Publication types