Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 22;11(5):290.
doi: 10.3390/toxins11050290.

Prevalent Mycotoxins in Animal Feed: Occurrence and Analytical Methods

Carolina Santos Pereira  1 , Sara C Cunha  2 , José O Fernandes  3
Affiliations
Review

Prevalent Mycotoxins in Animal Feed: Occurrence and Analytical Methods

Carolina Santos Pereira et al. Toxins (Basel). .

Abstract

Today, we have been witnessing a steady tendency in the increase of global demand for maize, wheat, soybeans, and their products due to the steady growth and strengthening of the livestock industry. Thus, animal feed safety has gradually become more important, with mycotoxins representing one of the most significant hazards. Mycotoxins comprise different classes of secondary metabolites of molds. With regard to animal feed, aflatoxins, fumonisins, ochratoxins, trichothecenes, and zearalenone are the more prevalent ones. In this review, several constraints posed by these contaminants at economical and commercial levels will be discussed, along with the legislation established in the European Union to restrict mycotoxins levels in animal feed. In addition, the occurrence of legislated mycotoxins in raw materials and their by-products for the feeds of interest, as well as in the feeds, will be reviewed. Finally, an overview of the different sample pretreatment and detection techniques reported for mycotoxin analysis will be presented, the main weaknesses of current methods will be highlighted.

Keywords: analytical methods; contaminants; feed; fungi; mycotoxins; occurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. European Commission Comission recomendation of 14 January 2011 establishing guidelines for the distinction between feed materials, feed additives, biocidal products and veterinary medicinal products. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2011;2011:75–79.
    1. Food Standards Agency Food.gov.uk. [(accessed on 4 December 2016)]; Available online: https://www.food.gov.uk/business-industry/farmingfood/animalfeed/what-fa....
    1. Adams C.A. Nutrition-based health in animal production. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2006;19:79–89. doi: 10.1079/NRR2005115. - DOI - PubMed
    1. GRACE Foundation GRACE Communications Foundation. [(accessed on 2 December 2016)]; Available online: http://www.sustainabletable.org/260/animal-feed.
    1. Pinotti L., Ottoboni M., Giromini C., Dell’Orto V., Cheli F. Mycotoxin Contamination in the EU Feed Supply Chain: A Focus on Cereal Byproducts. Toxins. 2016;8:45. doi: 10.3390/toxins8020045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types