Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;14(1):1622354.
doi: 10.1080/17482631.2019.1622354.

Cancer, a relational disease exploring the needs of relatives to cancer patients

Affiliations

Cancer, a relational disease exploring the needs of relatives to cancer patients

Ulrika Sandén et al. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: In this qualitative interview study we investigated the experiences of family members to cancer patients. Our objective was to explore and to differentiate their needs from the needs of cancer patients. Methods: Five focus groups and six individual narrative interviews with 17 family members to cancer patients in Sweden were conducted and compared with 19 cancer patient interviews. Our analysis was inspired by classic grounded theory. Results: Family members to cancer patients expressed own morbidity connected to high stress levels and difficulties in recognizing own stress due to ongoing comparisons with the cancer patient. Family members were trapped in a momentary terror-like situation where they became their sick relative's safety net. A percieved inability to improve their loved one's well being contributed to a feeling of guilt. The longing for it all to end was encumbered with shame since the end included possible death. Conclusions: By recognizing cancer as a disease striking both body and relationships, family members are given precedence over their own struggles, differentiated from the patient's experiences. We define differences in needs between cancer patients and family members. Family members to cancer patients may be supported in developing balancing strategies towards less stress, increased safety and moments of contentment.

Keywords: Health; cancer care; carers; family members; grounded theory; informal caregiver; momentary contentment; safety; salutogenesis; waiting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andreassen S., Randers I., Nyhlin K. T., & Mattiasson A. (2007). A meta-analysis of qualitative studies on living with oesophageal and clinically similar forms of cancer, seen from the perspective of patients and family members. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 2, 114–9.
    1. Antonovsky A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11(1), 11–18.
    1. Auyero J. (2011). Patients of the state: An ethnographic account of poor people’s waiting. Latin American Research Review, 46(1), 5–29. Retrieved fromhttp://lasa-4.univ.pitt.edu/LARR/prot/fulltext/Vol46no1/Auyero_5-29_46-1... - PubMed
    1. Bandura A. (1997). Insights. Self-efficacy. Harvard Mental Health Letter, 13(9), 4–6.
    1. Benzein E., Norberg A., & Saveman B.-I. (2001). The meaning of the lived experience of hope in patients with cancer in palliative home care. Palliative Medicine, 15(2), 117–126. - PubMed