Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 28:13:912.
doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.912. eCollection 2019.

The patient perspective: investigating patient empowerment enablers and barriers within the oncological care process

Affiliations

The patient perspective: investigating patient empowerment enablers and barriers within the oncological care process

Luca Bailo et al. Ecancermedicalscience. .

Abstract

Patient empowerment is a multi-factorial concept and its relevance has led to a growing body of literature; despite this attention, there is still no agreement regarding the elements that define its expression. While several studies have already investigated the positive effect of empowerment interventions on the care process outcome, the aim of this study is to investigate which factors can foster an empowered management of the cancer condition from the patient's perspective. To examine patients' perception of empowerment enablers, we asked for participants' input on the role of three factors frequently cited as positively affected by empowerment: care quality, perception of direct control and relationships within the care context, during the care process. Three focus groups were conducted with 34 cancer patients. The results highlight the perception of direct control on their treatment as the least valued element (2.87, SD 0.566) when compared with care quality (3.75, SD 0.649) and relational support in the care context (3.91, SD 0.274). Unlike traditional approaches to empowerment, patient's expression of empowerment does not mainly reside in the direct control of their condition as much as in an active role within the relationship with caretakers, such as the ability to choose the doctor, the care team or the health organisation in charge of their healthcare. Emerging aspects from this analysis of patient's perspective are central in order to adequately consider empowerment in the care process and to provide more effective care strategies.

Keywords: patient empowerment; patient participation; quality of healthcare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Patients’ evaluation of different elements that lead to empowerment.

References

    1. Chatzimarkakis J. Why patients should be more empowered: a European perspective on lessons learned in the management of diabetes. [28/5/2018];J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 4(6):1570–1573. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400634. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21129355] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Health 2020: a European policy framework and strategy for the 21st century. [11/05/2018];World Heal Organ. 2013 182 [ http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/199532/Health2020-Lo...]
    1. Cerezo PG, Juvé-Udina M-E, Delgado-Hito P. Concepts and measures of patient empowerment: a comprehensive review. [11/05/2018];J Sch Nurs USP. 2016 50(4):664–671. [ http:www.ee.usp.br/reeusp] - PubMed
    1. Zimmerman MA. Psychological empowerment: issues and illustrations. [11/05/2018];Am J Community Psychol. 1995 23(5):581–599. doi: 10.1007/BF02506983. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8851341] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rappaport J. In praise of paradox: a social policy of empowerment over prevention. [11/05/2018];Am J Community Psychol. 1981 9(1):1. doi: 10.1007/BF00896357. [ http://grow.ie/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/In-Praise-of-Paradox-A-Social-...] - DOI - PubMed