Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;24(2):683-691.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02894-0. Epub 2019 May 23.

Secondary caries: prevalence, characteristics, and approach

Ivana Nedeljkovic  1 , Jan De Munck  1 , Anouk Vanloy  1 , Dominique Declerck  2 , Paul Lambrechts  1 , Marleen Peumans  1 , Wim Teughels  3 , Bart Van Meerbeek  1 , Kirsten L Van Landuyt  4
Affiliations

Secondary caries: prevalence, characteristics, and approach

Ivana Nedeljkovic et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this cross-sectional survey were to determine the prevalence of secondary caries (SC) in general population, to identify patient- and material-related factors which may affect the prevalence, and to describe some clinical characteristics of SC lesions.

Materials and methods: A total of 4036 restorations in 450 patients, who visited the university dental clinic for a regular (half) yearly checkup, were examined clinically (and radiographically) for the presence of SC. Clinical characteristics of the detected SC lesions (size, activity, and location) and the planned treatment were recorded. In addition, patients' caries-risk status was assessed according to the modified "cariogram" model.

Results: In total, 146 restorations were diagnosed with SC, which gives an overall prevalence of 3.6%. Restorative material, restoration class, patient's caries risk, and smoking habits were shown to be important factors, as SC prevalence was significantly higher with composites, class II restorations, high-caries-risk patients, and smokers. Restorations' gingival margins were most frequently affected by SC. The largest number of restorations with SC (72%) was scheduled for the replacement.

Conclusions: Prevalence of SC was higher with composite than with amalgam restorations, irrespective of the patient's caries-risk status. Gingival margins of class II, including MOD restorations, seem to be the place of less resistance to SC development. Management of SC seems to place a considerable burden on the health care workforce and expenditure.

Clinical relevance: Secondary caries (SC) is considered to be the main cause of dental restoration failure and one of the biggest clinical challenges related to dental composites. Nevertheless, its prevalence in daily practice is still not clear, which impedes an accurate estimation of its impact on health care costs.

Keywords: Caries risk; Dental amalgam; Dental composite; Prevalence; Recurrent caries; Secondary caries.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Dent Res. 2016 Jul;95(8):875-81 - PubMed
    1. J Dent. 2011 Mar;39(3):225-30 - PubMed
    1. Br Dent J. 1983 Jun 11;154(11):363-5 - PubMed
    1. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1986 Feb;14(1):15-8 - PubMed
    1. Br Dent J. 2015 Jan;218(1):E2 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources