Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;42(9):1045-1053.
doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00831-4.

Enabling Data-Driven Clinical Quality Assurance: Predicting Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials Using Machine Learning

Affiliations

Enabling Data-Driven Clinical Quality Assurance: Predicting Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials Using Machine Learning

Timothé Ménard et al. Drug Saf. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Adverse event (AE) under-reporting has been a recurrent issue raised during health authorities Good Clinical Practices (GCP) inspections and audits. Moreover, safety under-reporting poses a risk to patient safety and data integrity. The current clinical Quality Assurance (QA) practices used to detect AE under-reporting rely heavily on investigator site and study audits. Yet several sponsors and institutions have had repeated findings related to safety reporting, and this has led to delays in regulatory submissions. Recent developments in data management and IT systems allow data scientists to apply techniques such as machine learning to detect AE under-reporting in an automated fashion.

Objective: In this project, we developed a predictive model that enables Roche/Genentech Quality Program Leads oversight of AE reporting at the program, study, site, and patient level. This project was part of a broader effort at Roche/Genentech Product Development Quality to apply advanced analytics to augment and complement traditional clinical QA approaches.

Method: We used a curated data set from 104 completed Roche/Genentech sponsored clinical studies to train a machine learning model to predict the expected number of AEs. Our final model used 54 features built on patient (e.g., demographics, vitals) and study attributes (e.g., molecule class, disease area).

Results: In order to evaluate model performance, we tested how well it would detect simulated test cases based on data not used for model training. For relevant simulation scenarios of 25%, 50%, and 75% under-reporting on the site level, our model scored an area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.62, 0.79, and 0.92, respectively.

Conclusion: The model has been deployed to evaluate safety reporting performance in a set of ongoing studies in the form of a QA/dashboard cockpit available to Roche Quality Program Leads. Applicability and production performance will be assessed over the next 12-24 months in which we will develop a validation strategy to fully integrate our model into Roche QA processes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Timothé Ménard, Yves Barmaz, Björn Koneswarakantha, Rich Bowling, and Leszek Popko were employed by Roche/Genentech at the time this research was completed.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the statistical scenario
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the zero scenario (for small investigator sites)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the percentage scenarios. UR under-reporting

References

    1. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. E26(R2) Guideline for Good Clinical Practices. 2016. https://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Ef.... Accessed 10 Dec 2018.
    1. Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. GCP inspection metrics report. 2018. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa.... Accessed 10 Dec 2018.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. 2018 inspection data set. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ICECI/Inspections/UCM628362.xlsx. Accessed 10 Dec 2018.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Investigator Responsibilities — Protecting the Rights, Safety, and Welfare of Study Subjects. 2009. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformat.... Accessed 10 Dec 2018.
    1. Pitrou I, Boutron I, Ahmad N, Ravaud P. Reporting of safety results in published reports of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1756–1761. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.306. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types