Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Jun;10(6):1489-1499.
doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13103. Epub 2019 May 23.

Lobectomy versus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for medically operable patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: A virtual randomized phase III trial stratified by age

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Lobectomy versus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for medically operable patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: A virtual randomized phase III trial stratified by age

Young-Seok Seo et al. Thorac Cancer. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Although the choice between stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been debated for years, the two procedures have not yet been directly compared in a randomized trial. We conducted a virtual randomized phase III trial stratified by age to compare the effectiveness of lobectomy and SABR for medically operable patients with stage IA (AJCC eighth) NSCLC using the Markov model analysis.

Methods: A Markov model was developed to simulate a cohort of patients aged 45-85 years with stage IA NSCLC who had undergone either lobectomy or SABR and were followed up for their remaining lifetime. Each virtual patient was randomly assigned to undergo lobectomy or SABR, and 10 000 patients were allocated to each group. All estimates of the variables were obtained by a systematic review of published articles.

Results: The lobectomy group showed a better life expectancy than the SABR group, in patients under 75 years of age. However, no statistically significant difference was seen in patients 75 years or older. The predicted life expectancy was 9.43 and 8.70 years in 75-year-old patients in the lobectomy and SABR groups, respectively. However, the 95%CI for the difference in life expectancy between the two groups was - 0.06-1.50 years (P = 0.0689).

Conclusions: The Markov model showed no statistically significant difference in the expected overall survival in stage IA NSCLC patients who were older than 75 years and had undergone SABR or lobectomy.

Keywords: Lobectomy; Markov model; non-small cell lung cancer; randomized trial; stereotactic radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A Scenario for the Markov state transition model of NSCLC less than 3 cm.Each rectangle represents a state of health. From the initial state, patients are randomized to undergo lobectomy or SABR. Straight arrows represent the changes that may occur during each cycle or a very short time interval. In contrast, gray rectangles mean that the patients may remain in the same Markov state for more than one cycle.NSCLC, non‐small cell lung cancer; SABR, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy; CTx, chemotherapy; RT, conventional radiotherapy; pN+, pathologically positive lymph node; NED, no evidence of disease; BSC, best supportive care.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated overall survival stratified by age at diagnosis in patients with stage IA NSCLC after lobectomy or SABR. Patients with stage IA NSCLC were stratified by age (a) 60 years, (b) 65 years, (c) 70 years, (d) 75 years, (e) 80 years, and (f) 85 years at diagnosis and overall survival was estimated in each of the cohorts using the Markov model. (formula image) Lobectomy and (formula image) SABR.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sensitivity analysis of varying probability of disease progression after primary treatment in 75‐year‐old patients. One‐way sensitivity analysis of varying probability of disease progression after (a) lobectomy and (b) SABR. SABR could be a preferred strategy if the probability of these two variables were changed beyond the threshold. (formula image) Lobectomy and (formula image) SABR. (c) Two‐way sensitivity analysis of the probability of disease progression after lobectomy and SABR: the dark gray region denotes lobectomy is preferred, while the light gray region shows SABR is preferred. SABR, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy; Dz_prog, disease progression.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Validation of the Markov model. The predicted (a) fiveyear survival curve after lobectomy and (b) threeyear survival curve after SABR based on the Markov model are shown. The gray circles represent the survival outcomes from real studies, wherein the median age of each cohort was set to a representative value at diagnosis. The black square is the average of the values from these real studies. The mean overall survival following lobectomy and SABR in the real studies were approximately 1% and 2% lower, respectively than those obtained from the Markov model. SABR, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. (formula image) Markov model, (formula image) clinical trials, and (formula image) mean value of clinical trials.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Koto M, Takai Y, Ogawa Y et al. A phase II study on stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I non‐small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 2007; 85: 429–34. - PubMed
    1. Takeda A, Sanuki N, Kunieda E et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary lung cancer at a dose of 50 Gy total in five fractions to the periphery of the planning target volume calculated using a superposition algorithm. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 73: 442–8. - PubMed
    1. Chang JY, Senan S, Paul MA et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non‐small‐cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of two randomised trials. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 630–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sun B, Brooks ED, Komaki RU et al. 7‐year follow‐up after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for patients with stage I non‐small cell lung cancer: Results of a phase 2 clinical trial. Cancer 2017; 123: 3031–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumann P, Nyman J, Hoyer M et al. Outcome in a prospective phase II trial of medically inoperable stage I non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 3290–6. - PubMed

Publication types