Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;5(3):462-469.
doi: 10.1002/vms3.175. Epub 2019 May 23.

Detection and isolation of Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains in caecal samples from pigs at slaughter in Italy

Affiliations

Detection and isolation of Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains in caecal samples from pigs at slaughter in Italy

Silvia Arancia et al. Vet Med Sci. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains are food-borne pathogens of public health concern. Despite ruminants are the most important reservoir, STEC human infections have also been attributed to pigs. We examined for the presence of STEC in 234 samples of swine caecal content collected during the year 2015 at Italian abattoirs in the framework of the harmonized monitoring of antimicrobial resistance (Decision 2013/652/EU). The presence of stx genes was detected in 122 (52.1%) samples, which were subsequently subjected to STEC isolation and characterization. The analysis of the 66 isolated STEC strains showed that the majority of the isolates (74.2%) possessed the stx2a gene subtype, in a few cases (16.7%) in combination with stx2b or stx2c. Only 25.8% of isolates possessed the stx2e subtype, typical of swine-adapted STEC. None of the isolates possessed the intimin-coding eae gene and the majority of them did not belong to serogroups commonly associated with human infections. The results of this study suggest that pigs can be considered as potential reservoir of certain STEC types.

Keywords: STEC prevalence; stx subtypes; swine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baranzoni G.M., Fratamico P.M., Gangiredla J., Patel I., Bagi L.K., Delannoy S. et al (2016) Characterization of Shiga Toxin Subtypes and Virulence Genes in Porcine Shiga Toxin‐Producing Escherichia coli . Frontiers in Microbiology 7, 574. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bardasi L., Taddei R., Fiocchi I., Pelliconi M.F., Ramini M., Toschi E. & Merialdi G. (2017) Shiga Toxin‐Producing Escherichia coli in Slaughtered Pigs and Pork Products. Italian Journal of Food Safety 6, 6584. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beutin L., Krause G., Zimmermann S., Kaulfuss S. & Gleier K. (2004) Characterization of Shiga toxin‐producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from human patients in Germany over a 3‐year period. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42, 1099–1108. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caprioli A., Morabito S., Brugere H. & Oswald E. (2005) Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli: emerging issues on virulence and modes of transmission. Veterinary Research 36, 289–311. - PubMed
    1. Casanova N.A., Redondo L.M., Dailoff G.C., Arenas D. & Fernández Miyakawa M.E. (2018) Overview of the role of Shiga toxins in porcine edema disease pathogenesis. Toxicon 15, 149–154. - PubMed

Publication types