The incidence of intraoperative gastric tube malposition verified by Point-of-Care Ultrasound
- PMID: 31124621
- PMCID: PMC7410345
- DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13530-4
The incidence of intraoperative gastric tube malposition verified by Point-of-Care Ultrasound
Abstract
Background: Over a million gastric tubes are placed yearly for varying medical reasons including gastric decompression. In the operating room (OR), this is performed blindly, and position is confirmed by auscultation, aspiration, or palpation by a surgeon. Despite the known risks of malpositioned gastric tubes, there is limited data in anesthesia literature about the incidence of intraoperative malpositioned gastric tubes. In this study, we use Point-of-Care ultrasonography (POCUS) to confirm gastric tube placement in the OR.
Methods: Prospective observational study with a total of 149 subjects, all over 18 years of age, undergoing surgery with general endotracheal anesthesia and intraoperative blind placement of a gastric tube by an anesthesia provider. The primary objective of this study is to determine the incidence of malposition of blindly placed gastric tubes.
Results: In our analysis, we found that out of 149 patients 110 patients were successfully visualized; the incidence of malposition was 0.14 [95% CI: 0.08-0.21]. We did not find age, Body Mass Index, or sex to be associated with predisposing patients to intraoperative malposition of gastric tube. However, increasing years of experience of anesthesia provider correlated with higher malposition rates.
Conclusions: In summary, we demonstrated that the incidence of malposition of blindly gastric tubes was 14%. Given the attendant risks of malpositioned gastric tubes, this data should inform decision algorithms for the blind placement of gastric tubes.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Comment in
-
Are you sure of the "other tube"? Role of ultrasound in the evaluation of gastric tube positioning in the operating room.Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Nov;85(11):1149-1150. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13878-3. Epub 2019 Jun 17. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019. PMID: 31213051 No abstract available.
References
-
- Sanaie S, Mahmoodpoor A, Najafi M. Nasogastric tube insertion in anaesthetized patients: a comprehensive review. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2017;49:57–65. - PubMed
-
- Neumann MJ, Meyer CT, Dutton JL, Smith R. Hold that x-ray: aspirate pH and auscultation prove enteral tube placement. J Clin Gastroenterol 1995;20:293–5. - PubMed
-
- Turgay AS, Khorshid L. Effectiveness of the auscultatory and pH methods in predicting feeding tube placement. J Clin Nurs 2010;19:1553–9. - PubMed
-
- Fan EM, Tan SB, Ang SY Nasogastric tube placement confirmation: where we are and where we should be heading. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare 2017;26:189–95.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources