Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan/Feb;41(1):95-105.
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000746.

The Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and Screening Tool Based on Psychometric Reevaluation of the Hearing Handicap Inventories for the Elderly and Adults

Christy Cassarly  1   2   3 , Lois J Matthews  2 , Annie N Simpson  2   3 , Judy R Dubno  2   3
Affiliations

The Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and Screening Tool Based on Psychometric Reevaluation of the Hearing Handicap Inventories for the Elderly and Adults

Christy Cassarly et al. Ear Hear. 2020 Jan/Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: The present study evaluates the items of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly and Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIE/A) using Mokken scale analysis (MSA), a type of nonparametric item response theory, and develops updated tools with optimal psychometric properties.

Design: In a longitudinal study of age-related hearing loss, 1447 adults completed the HHIE/A and audiometric testing at baseline. Discriminant validity of the emotional consequences and social/situational effects subscales of the HHIE/A was assessed, and nonparametric item response theory was used to explore dimensionality of the items of the HHIE/A and to refine the scales.

Results: The HHIE/A items form strong unidimensional scales measuring self-perceived hearing handicap, but with a lack of discriminant validity of the two distinct subscales. Two revised scales, the 18-item Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and the 10-item Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory-Screening, were developed from the common items of the original HHIE/A that met the assumptions of MSA. The items on both of the revised scales can be ordered in terms of increasing difficulty.

Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that the newly developed Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory-Screening are strong unidimensional, clinically informative measures of self-perceived hearing handicap that can be used for adults of all ages. The real-data example also demonstrates that MSA is a valuable alternative to classical psychometric analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Receiver operating characteristic curve for using the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory (RHHI) score to predict hearing loss. The cutoff with maximum Youden Index (≥6) is labeled with the symbol Y.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Receiver operating characteristic curve for using the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory – Screening (RHHI-S) score to predict hearing loss. The cutoff with maximum Youden Index (≥6) is labeled with the symbol Y.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Boeschen Hospers JM, Smits N, Smits C, et al. (2016). Reevaluation of the Amsterdam Inventory for Auditory Disability and Handicap using item response theory. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 59, 373–383. - PubMed
    1. Cassarly C, Matthews LJ, Simpson AN, et al. Development and refinement of patient-reported outcomes for hearing: A brief introduction to nonparametric item response theory. Am J Audiol, in press. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chenault M, Berger M, Kremer B, et al. (2013). Quantification of experienced hearing problems with item response theory. Am J Audiol, 22, 252–262. - PubMed
    1. Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, et al. (1998). Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Am J Epidemiol, 148, 879–886. - PubMed
    1. Demorest ME, Wark DJ, Erdman SA (2011). Development of the Screening Test for Hearing Problems. Am J Audiol, 20, 100–110. - PubMed

Publication types